Jump to content


Belville Mafia: Day 1


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
108 replies to this topic

#1 Quarryman

Quarryman

  • It's crap (again)


    Posts: 4245
    Joined: 27-May 07
    Member: 1620
    Country: Norway

Posted 08 July 2011 - 12:03 AM

Posted Image

Day 1

Posted Image
The next morning after breakfast Quentin gathered his family around him in the living room to explain his plan for how to deal with the threat to the family.

"My dear family, lately it's become evident that some of you are trying to get rid of me, which I can sort of understand, but still, I won't accept it."

Posted Image
Putting a submachinegun on the table he continued.

"Luckily I have a solution for this problem. Every Day from now until the threat has been dealt with you'll vote out one amongst you (no, you can't vote out me, nice try) that will be disposed of by my loyal henchmen."

Posted Image
"So, what are you waiting for? Clearly you're all suspicious of someone, so get those accusations flying, but no actual voting yet, I won't start counting your votes until after lunch. Good luck."



Rules (stolen mainly from Hinckley this time):
1. Each player has been given a character to play, who is either Loyal or Not Loyal. To win the game, the Loyal must kill off all the Not Loyals, while the Not Loyals needs to outnumber the Loyals.

2. Each day you will vote to lynch a player. Voting should be done in the following format; Vote: Character (Player). Similarly, un-voting is to be done in the format; Un-vote: Character (Player). No other format will be accepted, and please note the use of bold text. A majority vote is required to lynch a player. When a majority vote is reached the Day ends. Un-voting after the majority has been reached won't be counted.

3. A game day will last a maximum of 48 hours. You may not vote in the first 16 hours. After the day has concluded, a Night stage will commence, which will last a maximum of 24 hours.

4. If a Day ends without someone being convicted there will be a random death among the non-voters (yes, this means it's technically possible to have a Day end without someone dying, but that's unlikely)

5. The alignment of lynched players will be revealed at the beginning of the next Day, as well as those that died during the Night.

6. You may not quote or pretend to quote anything sent to you by the game host via PM. This includes all the details of your character and role, as well as any night action results. Role claims and reporting of night action results are acceptable, but only in your own words. Do not attempt to use the structure of your role PM to your advantage.

7. Do not play the game outside the thread. Similarly, do not post out of character inside the thread. Game tactics and roles may only be discussed in the game thread.

8. The usage of any form of communication outside the Day threads are strictly forbidden (except for the Not Loyals which have their own writeboard for this)

9. You may not edit your posts. 1st offence: stern warning, 2nd offence: The untimely death of your character, the end of your game, and endless ridicule.

10. You must post in every day thread. One day without a post and your character will be killed with extreme prejudice.

11. There are no clues in the pictures. Any attempt at using them as such will result in instant death of your character, no warnings, no exceptions, no second chances.

12. If you encounter a problem or have a question, please contact the host via PM.



Posted Image


Quentin de Belle-ville, head of the Belle-ville family (NPC, host character)
played by Quarryman


Players:

Posted Image
Irena Spalkowa - only child from Quentin's second marriage, married to Sammy, mother of Rupert and Amy
played by Shadows

Posted Image
Dragana de Belle-ville - married to Henry
played by Dragonator

Posted Image
Fuchsia de Belle-ville - married to Daniel
played by Fugazi

Posted Image
Cornelia Steinethaler - younger sister of Quentin, married to Jacob, mother of Petra.
played by CorneliusMurdock

Posted Image
Richelle de Belle-ville - married to Tammo
played by Ricecracker

Posted Image
Rupert Spalkowa - son of Irena and Sammy, brother of Amy
played by Rufus

Posted Image
Amy Spalkowa - daughter of Irena and Sammy, sister of Rupert
played by iamded

Posted Image
Petra Steinethaler, only child of Jacob and Cornelia
played by Peanuts

Posted Image
Sammy Spalkowa, married to Irena, father of Rupert and Amy
played by Sandy

Posted Image
Henry de Belle-ville, oldest son of Quentin from his first marriage, married to Dragana
played by Hinckley

Posted Image
Jacob Steinethaler - married to Cornelia, father of Petra
played by JimButcher

Posted Image
Daniel de Belle-ville - youngest son of Quentin from his first marriage, married to Fuchsia
played by dannylonglegs

Posted Image
Tammo de Belle-ville, second son of Quentin from his first marriage, married to Richelle
played by Captain Tamamono


Reserves: (the list of reserves is very short, the only reason it's here at all is in case someone has to quit for valid, non-modkill reasons)
Sirius Black
Pandora
badboytje88
3.14159265358979323846264338327950..

#2 CorneliusMurdock

CorneliusMurdock

  • Planning for man date 2017


    Posts: 7577
    Joined: 09-March 10
    Member: 9860
    Country: USA

Posted 08 July 2011 - 12:34 AM

Oh my goodness!  What should we do?  does anyone have any suspicions yet?

New Member? Read This | Questions? Need Help? Ask Here

Site Guidelines | Eurobricks FAQ | Visual User Guide


#3 Tamamono

Tamamono

  • Needs more time to get it up


    Posts: 3375
    Joined: 02-February 11
    Member: 15794
    Country: The States

Posted 08 July 2011 - 12:46 AM

We must eradicate this threat to the family as quickly as possible! We can't let disloyal family members take down Dad's great empire!

Foorth Dyke, playing mafia again in Danny and Jack's the Second Crash.


#4 Ricecracker

Ricecracker

  • Stormed Out


    Posts: 4681
    Joined: 25-November 07
    Member: 2221
    Country: Canada

Posted 08 July 2011 - 12:56 AM

View PostCaptain Tamamono, on 08 July 2011 - 12:46 AM, said:

We must eradicate this threat to the family as quickly as possible! We can't let disloyal family members take down Dad's great empire!
Tammo, Honey, it's so reassuring to have you be the rock in this family. God knows I'm too emotionally frail for it! I don't know what I'd do without you. :wub:

You've made me even more confident now that we can rid ourselves of those scheming not loyal scum before they can harm us and Daddy's company.

#5 Peanuts

Peanuts

  • Pudgy


    Posts: 1791
    Joined: 01-February 10
    Member: 9384
    Country: Germany

Posted 08 July 2011 - 01:27 AM

Oh no, those bastards will try to murder us and, even more vitally, take Uncle Quentin's money! :cry_sad:
Why our amicable family? We've never hurt anyone...who'd be important. :look:
Oh, I'm so upset, help me, Mummy!


Posted Image

Playing as Joshua Sutton in Bob's Secret enemies.


#6 Fugazi

Fugazi

    Posts: 4134
    Joined: 08-January 10
    Member: 8966
    Country: Canada

Posted 08 July 2011 - 01:43 AM

View PostCorneliusMurdock, on 08 July 2011 - 12:34 AM, said:

Oh my goodness! What should we do? does anyone have any suspicions yet?
Are you kidding Cornelia? With this heated conversation going on, we're all pretty much set on who to vote for already! :sarcasm_hmpf: :snicker:


Anyway, it appears that we're all stuck in this room together, with no way of talking privately to one another. Every suspicion that we share, every action that we plan together will also be witnessed by the Not Loyal among us. This is something I'm not used with, and we must think of the most appropriate strategy in these unfortunate circumstances.

We do have a few options. We can shut our mouth, rely exclusively on our own deductions, and hope that those among us who can do something about the threat will act wisely during the night. Our actions will remain hidden from the scum but we won't able to join forces and coordinate plans, and we'll be heavily handicapped. I don't think this is a viable option at all.

Another solution would be to reveal our role only upon discovering vital information. It has pros and cons, pros being that investigation results and such will be revealed and help us getting at the Not Loyal. Of course, once revealed the important roles can become targets for the scum -- but also for the protectors.

The last option I see would be quite audacious. We could all reveal our roles right away, today. We could plan all of our actions in the open. It would be quite dangerous, but would also make it easier to find the liars among us, those whose actions do not match their claims. It would make this ordeal quite different from anything we might have encountered before.

I welcome any comments on this matter. In the meantime, I'll go and refresh my make-up. :blush:
New Member? Read This | Questions? Need Help? Ask Here
Site Guidelines | Eurobricks FAQ | Visual User Guide

#7 Peanuts

Peanuts

  • Pudgy


    Posts: 1791
    Joined: 01-February 10
    Member: 9384
    Country: Germany

Posted 08 July 2011 - 02:02 AM

View PostFugazi, on 08 July 2011 - 01:43 AM, said:

The last option I see would be quite audacious. We could all reveal our roles right away, today. We could plan all of our actions in the open. It would be quite dangerous, but would also make it easier to find the liars among us, those whose actions do not match their claims. It would make this ordeal quite different from anything we might have encountered before.
I don't think this would be a good idea, as we won't know who the scum will attack at night. If they knew all our night actions, they'd have good odds to get somebody with an important role unprotected, considering we got one or two protectors. Or they can take on the protectors, as they themselves have lower chances to be protected or even aim for vanillas, as they are certain to be vulnerable.
I think the second option is the best one, as it is less likely to overburden our protectors, but still might provide us some info.


Posted Image

Playing as Joshua Sutton in Bob's Secret enemies.


#8 Tamamono

Tamamono

  • Needs more time to get it up


    Posts: 3375
    Joined: 02-February 11
    Member: 15794
    Country: The States

Posted 08 July 2011 - 02:35 AM

View PostFugazi, on 08 July 2011 - 01:43 AM, said:

Anyway, it appears that we're all stuck in this room together, with no way of talking privately to one another. Every suspicion that we share, every action that we plan together will also be witnessed by the Not Loyal among us. This is something I'm not used with, and we must think of the most appropriate strategy in these unfortunate circumstances.

I agree that not being able to talk in private could possibly handicap us, but it could also save us from being tricked into giving away vital pieces of information by the Not Loyals. Although collaborating with fellow Loyals about theories, night actions, etc. is a good thing, you can't be sure that the person you're talking to isn't a Not Loyal trying to pry information out of you.

Quote

We do have a few options. We can shut our mouth, rely exclusively on our own deductions, and hope that those among us who can do something about the threat will act wisely during the night. Our actions will remain hidden from the scum but we won't able to join forces and coordinate plans, and we'll be heavily handicapped. I don't think this is a viable option at all.

Keeping everything secret would make it hard for us to lynch all the Not Loyal members. However, if we keep only night actions a secret, and form our theories and the like of which in public, then I think we can still reach accurate convictions based off of behavioral patterns.

Quote

Another solution would be to reveal our role only upon discovering vital information. It has pros and cons, pros being that investigation results and such will be revealed and help us getting at the Not Loyal. Of course, once revealed the important roles can become targets for the scum -- but also for the protectors.

This is, as Petra said, our best option. Every coin had two sides, and in an ordeal like this one, it's best not to go to one extreme or the other.

Quote

The last option I see would be quite audacious. We could all reveal our roles right away, today. We could plan all of our actions in the open. It would be quite dangerous, but would also make it easier to find the liars among us, those whose actions do not match their claims. It would make this ordeal quite different from anything we might have encountered before.

Okay, I understand that you're trying to help the de-Belle ville family as you can, but I have to say that this option is totally ridiculous. If everyone roleclaims, then the protectors will know who to protect, but what's to say that they will protect the wrong person? Then we'll have lost a vital member of the Loyals.

However, it's a bit early to be thinking about night actions, instead we should be focusing on convicting a Not Loyal today.


View PostRicecracker, on 08 July 2011 - 12:56 AM, said:

Tammo, Honey, it's so reassuring to have you be the rock in this family. God knows I'm too emotionally frail for it! I don't know what I'd do without you. :wub:

You've made me even more confident now that we can rid ourselves of those scheming not loyal scum before they can harm us and Daddy's company.

Aww, don't worry Richelle. :wub: We'll get those mean Not Loyal family members and make them pay for threatening our safety and happiness!

Foorth Dyke, playing mafia again in Danny and Jack's the Second Crash.


#9 CorneliusMurdock

CorneliusMurdock

  • Planning for man date 2017


    Posts: 7577
    Joined: 09-March 10
    Member: 9860
    Country: USA

Posted 08 July 2011 - 03:11 AM

View PostPeanuts, on 08 July 2011 - 01:27 AM, said:

Oh, I'm so upset, help me, Mummy!
Mummy's here, Angel!  It'll be all right...

I agree with Tammo that it's somewhat early to worry about night actions when none have happened yet.  I think we must trust to the judgment of our fellow Loyal family members to decide when the best time for them to come forward with important information.  I don't feel that it's a choice we should make for them.  And certainly revealing everyone now before they even get a chance to work would only play into the hands of those not Loyal.  

That being said, I don't know how we're going to find traitorous scum today without one of them slipping up.

New Member? Read This | Questions? Need Help? Ask Here

Site Guidelines | Eurobricks FAQ | Visual User Guide


#10 iamded

iamded

  • Cannot neigh to save his life.


    Posts: 5033
    Joined: 09-January 07
    Member: 1225
    Country: New Zealand!

Posted 08 July 2011 - 03:28 AM

Okay, let's get to stopping these 'Not Loyals' from taking over gramps' empire!

View PostFugazi, on 08 July 2011 - 01:43 AM, said:

The last option I see would be quite audacious. We could all reveal our roles right away, today. We could plan all of our actions in the open. It would be quite dangerous, but would also make it easier to find the liars among us, those whose actions do not match their claims. It would make this ordeal quite different from anything we might have encountered before.
But that's not really an option, is it? Revealing all our roles will have the scummy traitors among us killing off all the people who can help first. That's as viable an option as having the scummy traitors just come up and confess. But I know your just listing the extremes to get them out of the way. Anyway, the second option seems the most viable for the moment. But ah, we do need to come to a conclusion today. Let's wait to hear in from everyone before we start casting stones.


Check out Eurobricks' RPG, Mafia and Wargames forum for the fun times!


#11 Hinckley

Hinckley

  • Reay for 2017!


    Posts: 33424
    Joined: 15-September 05
    Member: 486
    Country: Chicago, USA

Posted 08 July 2011 - 03:46 AM

View PostQuarryman, on 08 July 2011 - 12:03 AM, said:


The next morning after breakfast Quentin gathered his family around him in the living room to explain his plan for how to deal with the threat to the family.

Oh dear, I must have dozed off. I do have the habit of daydreaming. The morning after what? What threat? Can someone point me in the right direction as to what Father is talking about? :wacko:

He must mean this:

View PostQuarryman, on 28 June 2011 - 10:35 PM, said:

Quentin de Belle-ville had it all; tons of money from a business empire dealing in chocolate and perfume, more power than any sane man would want, and a loving and caring family to share it all with. Except.. they were perhaps not all as loving and caring as they would like to pretend to be.. in his later years it became more and more obvious that some members of the family were Not Loyal and plotting to take control of the family business empire. So in an attempt to solve this problem once and for all Quentin has gathered the family for one last reunion at his splendid mansion.

Luckily one does not make it to the top of the lucrative chocolate and perfume market without acquiring more than a few enemies along the way, and thus making it necessary to have means to deal with such enemies. So Quentin has, with the help of various old accomplishes and henchmen, solutions to dispatch of the dead bodies without the FBI finding out what is going on at the Belle-ville mansion and will have his family vote to kill one member each Day until the threat to the Family is dead and buried...

View PostCorneliusMurdock, on 08 July 2011 - 12:34 AM, said:

does anyone have any suspicions yet?
I was kind of suspicious of the most likely suspect: Petra, the tiny little girl! Who would suspect such an innocent face. I bet the Not Loyals recruited her. Besides, her knowledge of the threat before Father announced it to all of us is the only suspicion I have to go on.

View PostFugazi, on 08 July 2011 - 01:43 AM, said:


The last option I see would be quite audacious. We could all reveal our roles right away, today. We could plan all of our actions in the open. It would be quite dangerous, but would also make it easier to find the liars among us, those whose actions do not match their claims. It would make this ordeal quite different from anything we might have encountered before.

That is audacious, but bold. It would be smart for us not to reveal the protectors. That way the protector can decide who is most likely telling the truth and who is the most important to protect. Keeping our protectors identities hidden will protect them from being killed by the Not Loyal. There are just as many ways for the scummy Not Loyals to trick us out in the open as there would be in private. :scpetic: This idea has merit, it's unprecedented, but perhaps some more thought is due to this idea.

View PostPeanuts, on 08 July 2011 - 02:02 AM, said:

I don't think this would be a good idea, as we won't know who the scum will attack at night. If they knew all our night actions, they'd have good odds to get somebody with an important role unprotected, considering we got one or two protectors. Or they can take on the protectors, as they themselves have lower chances to be protected or even aim for vanillas, as they are certain to be vulnerable.
I think the second option is the best one, as it is less likely to overburden our protectors, but still might provide us some info.
Yeah, this one. This little girl is clearly a killer. Look at her. I mean, look at her, she just exudes evil.

#12 Dannylonglegs

Dannylonglegs

  • History Expert


    Posts: 7277
    Joined: 05-February 09
    Member: 5222
    Country: USA

Posted 08 July 2011 - 03:55 AM

View PostFugazi, on 08 July 2011 - 01:43 AM, said:


Anyway, it appears that we're all stuck in this room together, with no way of talking privately to one another.
Come to think of it, that means that we can't do anything privately :oh3: :look:  

View PostFugazi, on 08 July 2011 - 01:43 AM, said:

We do have a few options. We can shut our mouth, rely exclusively on our own deductions, and hope that those among us who can do something about the threat will act wisely during the night. Our actions will remain hidden from the scum but we won't able to join forces and coordinate plans, and we'll be heavily handicapped. I don't think this is a viable option at all.
I agree, this mode of action leaves too much up to chance. Also it's far too passive. If we are to defeat our treacherous family members, we've gotta take matters into our own hands!

View PostFugazi, on 08 July 2011 - 01:43 AM, said:

Another solution would be to reveal our role only upon discovering vital information. It has pros and cons, pros being that investigation results and such will be revealed and help us getting at the Not Loyal. Of course, once revealed the important roles can become targets for the scum -- but also for the protectors.

I think this one takes the cake! Although, maybe with a few exceptions, like the protector. We can't have him or her reveal his or her role, because then the scum could easily single him or her out and shank him or her with his or her boxer briefs or panties down! After that, we wouldn't have any protection at all! The investigator, I think should be the only one to reveal his or her role, and only when the time's right, such as after a successful investigation.

View PostFugazi, on 08 July 2011 - 01:43 AM, said:

The last option I see would be quite audacious. We could all reveal our roles right away, today. We could plan all of our actions in the open. It would be quite dangerous, but would also make it easier to find the liars among us, those whose actions do not match their claims. It would make this ordeal quite different from anything we might have encountered before.
I don't even see this as an option, if everyone claims a role than the room will be in total chaos!

Playing as the Begonya Siblings, Feliks and Nadine Begonya, a pair of russian-accented Mitgardian traders! Sylph Solanum in Heroica! Doctor Danielle Long works for Octan in AG!

Here's my Flickr account.

Posted ImagePosted Image


#13 CorneliusMurdock

CorneliusMurdock

  • Planning for man date 2017


    Posts: 7577
    Joined: 09-March 10
    Member: 9860
    Country: USA

Posted 08 July 2011 - 03:59 AM

View PostHinckley, on 08 July 2011 - 03:46 AM, said:

Yeah, this one. This little girl is clearly a killer. Look at her. I mean, look at her, she just exudes evil.
Sorry, nephew, but people with evil goatees shouldn't throw stones... :laugh:

I don't think my little Angel could possibly be scum.  She's just the sweetest little thing on the planet.

Quote

Come to think of it, that means that we can't do anything privately
Uh oh, I just drank like five cups of coffee.

New Member? Read This | Questions? Need Help? Ask Here

Site Guidelines | Eurobricks FAQ | Visual User Guide


#14 Peanuts

Peanuts

  • Pudgy


    Posts: 1791
    Joined: 01-February 10
    Member: 9384
    Country: Germany

Posted 08 July 2011 - 04:01 AM

View PostHinckley, on 08 July 2011 - 03:46 AM, said:

I was kind of suspicious of the most likely suspect: Petra, the tiny little girl! Who would suspect such an innocent face. I bet the Not Loyals recruited her. Besides, her knowledge of the threat before Father announced it to all of us is the only suspicion I have to go on.

Yeah, this one. This little girl is clearly a killer. Look at her. I mean, look at her, she just exudes evil.
Why me again? You, Sir, are the chocalate pie-faced stalking weirdo, not me. :hmpf_bad:
And what makes you believe I was a killer? My lovely blonde hair? My decorative pink headband? My cute Gatling gun? That's preposterous!


Posted Image

Playing as Joshua Sutton in Bob's Secret enemies.


#15 Shadows

Shadows

  • Free Online Spell Checker


    Posts: 14929
    Joined: 30-April 07
    Member: 1558
    Country: USA

Posted 08 July 2011 - 05:09 AM

This is horrible! It's one thing when the world tries to get you, but when it's your own family, that's just too much! :sadnew:

View PostPeanuts, on 08 July 2011 - 04:01 AM, said:

Why me again? You, Sir, are the chocalate pie-faced stalking weirdo, not me. :hmpf_bad:
Hey, don't go throwing allegations at my dear brother just because he has the creepiest face, that's no way to spot scum!

Speaking of which, does anyone have evil eyebrows? Evil eyebrows are a perfectly acceptable way of spotting scum.

Shadows is looking for stalkers. Yep, you heard me right. CLICKY!



New Member? Read This | Questions? Need Help? Ask Here
Site Guidelines | Eurobricks FAQ | Visual User Guide | Tutorials


#16 Dragonator

Dragonator

  • Blurry? No! Furry? Who knows?


    Posts: 4924
    Joined: 07-October 07
    Member: 2052
    Country: New Zealand

Posted 08 July 2011 - 05:33 AM

I love you Henry, you are my world. :wub: I may be a gorgeous blonde, but don't be mistaken, I know a good nail polish when I see one. :sweet:

View PostHinckley, on 08 July 2011 - 03:46 AM, said:

I was kind of suspicious of the most likely suspect: Petra, the tiny little girl! Who would suspect such an innocent face. I bet the Not Loyals recruited her. Besides, her knowledge of the threat before Father announced it to all of us is the only suspicion I have to go on.
Henry you are so wise and gorgeous and handsome and wise and handsome! :wub: Can we go make babies again now? I like making babies. Except the babies part, babies are revolting. I told Irena that, but did she listen? And now she has that spoilt little blonde girl, Petra, I mean I don't even understand how that is genetically possible!  *huh* I bet she's adopted, so that's funny at least.

New Member? Read This | Questions? Need Help? Ask Here

Site Guidelines | Eurobricks FAQ | Visual User Guide | Tutorials


Feel like relaxing with a blood-thirsty game? Check out the LEGO Mafia, RPG and Wargames forum


#17 CorneliusMurdock

CorneliusMurdock

  • Planning for man date 2017


    Posts: 7577
    Joined: 09-March 10
    Member: 9860
    Country: USA

Posted 08 July 2011 - 05:45 AM

View PostDragonator, on 08 July 2011 - 05:33 AM, said:

I told Irena that, but did she listen? And now she has that spoilt little blonde girl, Petra, I mean I don't even understand how that is genetically possible!  *huh* I bet she's adopted, so that's funny at least.

Petra is my little Angel, dear.  Do keep up.  Irena has Rupert and Amy.
Petra may be a little spoiled (her father always does buy her the biggest guns) but she is such a little sweet heart that it's so hard to say no to that pudgy little face. :laugh:

New Member? Read This | Questions? Need Help? Ask Here

Site Guidelines | Eurobricks FAQ | Visual User Guide


#18 JimBee

JimBee

  • Shroom Eating Cultist


    Posts: 11221
    Joined: 07-January 08
    Member: 2436
    Country: USA

Posted 08 July 2011 - 05:59 AM

View PostHinckley, on 08 July 2011 - 03:46 AM, said:

I was kind of suspicious of the most likely suspect: Petra, the tiny little girl! Who would suspect such an innocent face. I bet the Not Loyals recruited her. Besides, her knowledge of the threat before Father announced it to all of us is the only suspicion I have to go on.

Back off my daughter, chocolate-faced fiend!

*Cough* Uh, then again, that crate of SMGs she begged me for couldn't have been for decoration...

Posted ImagePosted Image
Currently playing Hybros, 55-year-old male imp Marauder, and

Jinnipher Buchaire, 77-year-old female Moon Elven Knight

in the Heroica RPG

Wiki


#19 iamded

iamded

  • Cannot neigh to save his life.


    Posts: 5033
    Joined: 09-January 07
    Member: 1225
    Country: New Zealand!

Posted 08 July 2011 - 06:54 AM

View PostDragonator, on 08 July 2011 - 05:33 AM, said:

I like making babies. Expect the babies part,
Expect the babies? Who's expecting? Dragana, are you pregnant?! *oh2*
Say mother, have you seen the rest of our family around? I can't seem to find father or Rupert...


Check out Eurobricks' RPG, Mafia and Wargames forum for the fun times!


#20 Rufus

Rufus

  • Schnell! Schnell! Kartoffelkopf!


    Posts: 5057
    Joined: 15-July 09
    Member: 6705
    Country: EU

Posted 08 July 2011 - 07:45 AM

View Postiamded, on 08 July 2011 - 06:54 AM, said:

Say mother, have you seen the rest of our family around? I can't seem to find father or Rupert...
Here I am, sis!  I was just playing with these new plastic construction toys Daddy bought me.  The little figures are so small and weird, not like us beautiful people at all :sick:

At least our parents get us sensible toys, not like Petra and her guns.

View Postiamded, on 08 July 2011 - 06:54 AM, said:

Expect the babies? Who's expecting? Dragana, are you pregnant?! *oh2*
Not likely with her husband preferring chocolate cake to cherry pie :wink:

#21 Hinckley

Hinckley

  • Reay for 2017!


    Posts: 33424
    Joined: 15-September 05
    Member: 486
    Country: Chicago, USA

Posted 08 July 2011 - 07:51 AM

View PostCorneliusMurdock, on 08 July 2011 - 03:59 AM, said:

Sorry, nephew, but people with evil goatees shouldn't throw stones... :laugh:
It's chocolate!

View PostPeanuts, on 08 July 2011 - 04:01 AM, said:

Why me again? You, Sir, are the chocalate pie-faced stalking weirdo, not me. :hmpf_bad:
And what makes you believe I was a killer? My lovely blonde hair? My decorative pink headband? My cute Gatling gun? That's preposterous!
I already told you. Because you mentioned the treacherous scum before Father told the family about them. :hmpf: You scummy scumbag. :hmpf_bad":

View PostDragonator, on 08 July 2011 - 05:33 AM, said:

Henry you are so wise and gorgeous and handsome and wise and handsome! :wub: Can we go make babies again now? I like making babies. Expect the babies part, babies are revolting. I told Irena that, but did she listen? And now she has that spoilt little blonde girl, Petra, I mean I don't even understand how that is genetically possible!  *huh* I bet she's adopted, so that's funny at least.
I Dragana you have such a tight cooter. I love to make babies in it. It feels rather good. Let's do that now. We can't leave the room, and I can't go five minutes without baby-making. Oh, don't worry about the pesky babies. We can hire someone to raise them and take over when they mature and become interesting. Then, they can take care of us when we're old and infirm.  

View PostCorneliusMurdock, on 08 July 2011 - 05:45 AM, said:

Petra is my little Angel, dear.  Do keep up.  Irena has Rupert and Amy.
Petra may be a little spoiled (her father always does buy her the biggest guns) but she is such a little sweet heart that it's so hard to say no to that pudgy little face. :laugh:
Pudgy? :wacko: She's definitely scum then.

Pudgy scum are the worst kind. :hmpf_bad:

View PostRufus, on 08 July 2011 - 07:45 AM, said:

Not likely with her husband preferring chocolate cake to cherry pie :wink:
No she likes me eating her chocolate pie better. Trust me. Otherwise my face would be in her cherry pie every night! And I go back for seconds and thirds. :drool:

#22 Sandy

Sandy

  • It's definitely not an anagram!


    Posts: 12242
    Joined: 31-May 08
    Member: 3211
    Country: Finland

Posted 08 July 2011 - 09:49 AM

Ah, your family is giving me a headache again, Irena...

Listen, I don't know which one of you guys are not loyal to Quentin, but I sure as hell am. I agree that being open is most likely our best weapon against the scum, but I don't think we should lay all our cards on the table on Day One.

If there is an investigator, I believe they should come out only after they've found out one or two of the scumbags.

The protector should focus on keeping the most active relatives alive, because I don't believe the not-loyals would go around loudly accusing people.

As for any other roles some of you may play, I don't think you should reveal them straight away, but only if you become under the threat of being voted out.

It's hard that we cannot make secret allies, but I have high faith in my two gorgeous children and my lovely wife that they wouldn't betray their patron. Because if they do, I'll give them the spanking of a lifetime.

Now, who to point a finger to? Isn't Henry the Chocolate Goatee the firstborn of Quentin? That would mean he's the most eligible to take on his father's firm after Quentin is gone, am I right? I know it's a long shot, but something about accusing pretty (albeit a bit pudgy) little girls just rubs me the wrong way.

~Now playing as Ellaria Arbour and Quintessa of Heartland in Heroica RPG~


#23 Dragonator

Dragonator

  • Blurry? No! Furry? Who knows?


    Posts: 4924
    Joined: 07-October 07
    Member: 2052
    Country: New Zealand

Posted 08 July 2011 - 10:12 AM

View PostCorneliusMurdock, on 08 July 2011 - 05:45 AM, said:

Petra is my little Angel, dear.  Do keep up.  Irena has Rupert and Amy.
That makes more sense, I can see the resemblance. :sick:

I always thought Amy was adopted, but Rupert? Goodness, poor child.

New Member? Read This | Questions? Need Help? Ask Here

Site Guidelines | Eurobricks FAQ | Visual User Guide | Tutorials


Feel like relaxing with a blood-thirsty game? Check out the LEGO Mafia, RPG and Wargames forum


#24 Sandy

Sandy

  • It's definitely not an anagram!


    Posts: 12242
    Joined: 31-May 08
    Member: 3211
    Country: Finland

Posted 08 July 2011 - 10:28 AM

View PostDragonator, on 08 July 2011 - 10:12 AM, said:

I always thought Amy was adopted, but Rupert? Goodness, poor child.

Hey, back off Dragana! These are my kids you're talking about! I made them, and they both took a hard night of heavy thrusting and squirming to get done!

That's right kids, it's about time you learn about bees and flowers.

~Now playing as Ellaria Arbour and Quintessa of Heartland in Heroica RPG~


#25 Dragonator

Dragonator

  • Blurry? No! Furry? Who knows?


    Posts: 4924
    Joined: 07-October 07
    Member: 2052
    Country: New Zealand

Posted 08 July 2011 - 10:40 AM

View PostSandy, on 08 July 2011 - 10:28 AM, said:

Hey, back off Dragana! These are my kids you're talking about! I made them, and they both took a hard night of heavy thrusting and squirming to get done!
Oh I see... that's rather awkward. Does Irena know? She is your wife, she has a right to know who you've been thrusting with at night.

Anyone want some pie? I baked it fresh this morning. :sweet:

New Member? Read This | Questions? Need Help? Ask Here

Site Guidelines | Eurobricks FAQ | Visual User Guide | Tutorials


Feel like relaxing with a blood-thirsty game? Check out the LEGO Mafia, RPG and Wargames forum





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users