Jump to content

REVIEW: 3367 Space Shuttle

  • Please log in to reply
10 replies to this topic

Poll: REVIEW: 3367 Space Shuttle (13 member(s) have cast votes)

How do you rate this set?

  1. Poor (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  2. Below Average (3 votes [23.08%])

    Percentage of vote: 23.08%

  3. Average (6 votes [46.15%])

    Percentage of vote: 46.15%

  4. Above Average (4 votes [30.77%])

    Percentage of vote: 30.77%

  5. Excellent (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 dr_spock


  • BoBS IT Dept

    Posts: 9395
    Joined: 28-December 09
    Member: 8775
    Country: Canada

Posted 23 May 2011 - 06:12 AM

Posted Image

Name: 3367 Space Shuttle
Theme: LEGO City - Space
Year: 2011
Piece Count: 231
Minifigs: 1
Price: $39.99 CDN, $29.99 USD

Having released Shuttle Adventure last year, LEGO is back this year with another Space Shuttle. This time in the City Space theme.


The box is 10" x 15" X 2".  It has pretty photos of the product and the real NASA Space Shuttle.

Posted Image

Posted Image


Inside the box contains 2 plastic bags of parts, 1 loose plate, 1 small sticker sheet and 1 instruction booket.  The bags are numbered 1 and 2.  

Posted Image


The set comes with 1 minifigure.  A male astronaut.  He looks kind of grumpy.  Maybe he didn't get his coffee. Lets fix that with a number one standard grin head transplant (not included in the set).

Posted Image


The build was very straight forward with the numbered bags. The printed instructions were clear and easy to follow.  It shouldn't be any trouble for little children to build by following the pictures.

Posted Image

The completed Space Shuttle front view. I opted not to sticker mine.

Posted Image

The back view.

Posted Image

In the cockpit. LEGO seems to like their coffee.  I am not sure having an opened cup of coffee in the cockpit is a good idea.

Posted Image


Interesting parts.  Printed nose cone, large one piece tail, extra helmet (Atlantis style?)

Posted Image

Extra pieces.

Posted Image


Here is a side by side comparison with Shuttle Adventure:

Posted Image

Inside both have a satellite cargo for deployment.

Posted Image

The Space Shuttle is a bit smaller than the Shuttle Adventure. It is not as detailed. It doesn't have retracting landing gear. On the other hand, it can stand up to more rough play than the Shuttle Adventure.  There aren't as many small pieces to fall off and put back together.


Playability: 10/10
Design: 8/10
Price: 7/10 (17 cents CAD/piece)
Parts: 7/10
Minifigures: 7/10
Overall: 8/10

Lego has done a good job with the Space Shuttle in my opinion. It is quite playable and swooshing it around is fun. The bay doors open and a satellite can be deployed with the Canadian Arm.  I think the target audience for this set are kids. AFOLs will probably opt for the Shuttle Adventure/Expedition.

The Canadian price per piece is 17 cents CAD. That's pretty high compared to the 10 cents CAD per piece on the Shuttle Adventure/Expedition. I don't know if LEGO has to pay a NASA licensing fee.  The US price is better at 12 cents USD per piece.  From a parent point of view, spending $40/$30 for a kid is easier than $100+.

If you are Space Shuttle fan or have kids who like the Space Shuttle, it is worth considering.

Prepared for launch:

Posted Image

Edited by Zorbas, 23 May 2011 - 02:21 PM.

#2 Fuzzylegobricks


    Posts: 1260
    Joined: 12-September 10
    Member: 13204
    Country: USA

Posted 23 May 2011 - 06:36 AM

Very cool review dr_spock! The engines are really nice, but I think my favorite
part is usually the wheels on the planes. :grin: The old nasa sets had some great wheels then some terrible ones.
Is this already reviewed somewhere? :thumbup:
Won as Bianca Lamb in Hinckley's Mafia School Fabuland Housewives!

#3 buddy


    Posts: 1520
    Joined: 01-November 10
    Member: 14028
    Country: United Kingdom

Posted 23 May 2011 - 08:02 AM

Great review for a great set! This set looks nice and has some good features in it.  :thumbup:
Very well done on the review.  :classic:


#4 Night City Dream

Night City Dream

    Posts: 133
    Joined: 28-January 10
    Member: 9331
    Country: Russia

Posted 23 May 2011 - 09:33 AM

I actually don't like this set much. The shuttles back to 1990s were way more realistic in terms of design yet simpler and smaller. Here, only back part with fire coming out appeals to me.

1 minifig for a relatively large set is a bad contemporary traidition at Lego.

I can say the best set out of the line is the Van 3366.
My photos of Lego, Moscow & trips: http://fotki.yandex....ght-city-dream/

#5 sharky


    Posts: 437
    Joined: 19-May 11
    Member: 17931
    Country: USA

Posted 23 May 2011 - 02:51 PM

I got this set and was a bit disappointed.  I think it would be a good build for the younger Lego fan.  Visually, I think it looks nice.  I wasn't originally going to get it, but after seeing it on display in the Lego store I decided to buy it.

A few things I think would have improved the set.
  • Have some way to latch the cargo doors shut
  • Include an extra mini figure
  • Include some tool accessories
  • Use a different hinge mechanism on the wing flaps
  • Make the rear landing gear easier to remove for ease of play

#6 lightningtiger


  • Gungans taste like chicken

    Posts: 21406
    Joined: 28-October 09
    Member: 7997
    Country: Australia

Posted 23 May 2011 - 02:59 PM

Thanks 'spock' for this review, an excellent space shuttle.....well in the beginning I didn't like it but after building mine I was happy with it. :sweet:
Brick On ! :grin:

#7 prateek


  • Study hard!

    Posts: 10419
    Joined: 09-July 05
    Member: 426
    Country: Canada

Posted 23 May 2011 - 05:16 PM

Great review, although I'd rather save up and get the Shuttle Adventure.

#8 Zorbas


  • Tough on stains!

    Posts: 1472
    Joined: 07-December 08
    Member: 4609
    Country: Greece

Posted 23 May 2011 - 05:41 PM

Thanks for the very nice review dr_spock. :thumbup:

I built this set two weeks ago and I like it. The build wasn't something too spectacular but the finished model left me satisfied. I really like the printed detail on the cockpit/nose piece and the back of the shuttle looks pretty impressive with the turbines burning.

The small sattelite is a nice addition and the only thing that I would improve is the way the doors open in the sattelite's cargo area. It should have been a bit "smoother" I think. I really love the new NASA minifigs and the gold helmet really adds to the look.

View Postdr_spock, on 23 May 2011 - 06:12 AM, said:

He looks kind of grumpy. Maybe he didn't get his coffee. Lets fix that with a number one standard grin head transplant (not included in the set).
Great move! :sweet: I'm not a fan of that particular head either.

Thanks again for the review and props for the 10213 comparison photos. :thumbup:

Am I the only one that found the instructions' way of placing the rear wheels odd?
"Bricks and stones, timber and tiles - are of no use when dumped at random..."
Xenophon - "Memoirs of Socrates"

Got Questions? Need help? New member?
Read the site guidelines
Index of helpful tutorials

by Jebediahs

Posted Image

#9 LEGO Guy Bri

LEGO Guy Bri

    Posts: 3168
    Joined: 28-October 10
    Member: 13958
    Country: X

Posted 23 May 2011 - 09:34 PM

Great review 'dr_spock'. I don't think I will be getting this as I would rather get the more realistic one. There are too many colors :classic:
-I don't tell you how to tell me what to do, so don't you tell me how to do what you told me to do... I know when to use finesse

#10 Algernon


  • Not a Doofus

    Posts: 2252
    Joined: 21-January 08
    Member: 2558

Posted 23 May 2011 - 09:50 PM

I'm not a huge fan of this set. It's not terrible, but it seems pretty lacking in detail and looks more like a smallish airplane than a spacefairing vessel. And with the excellent Shuttle Adventure available, I don't see a reason to pick this up at all.

Thanks for the review!

#11 dr_spock


  • BoBS IT Dept

    Posts: 9395
    Joined: 28-December 09
    Member: 8775
    Country: Canada

Posted 25 May 2011 - 12:33 AM

Thanks guys.   :classic:

View PostZorbas, on 23 May 2011 - 05:41 PM, said:

Am I the only one that found the instructions' way of placing the rear wheels odd?

It seems kind of pointed backwards.  I think I'll reuse the landing gears for a SCA (Shuttle Carrier Aircraft) MOD.

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users