Jump to content

REVIEW: 4195 Queen Anne's Revenge

  • Please log in to reply
157 replies to this topic  – Started by TheBrickster , Apr 17 2011 06:58 AM

Poll: On a scale of 1 to 5 (224 member(s) have cast votes)

How do you rate this set?

  1. 1 - Poor (6 votes [2.68%])

    Percentage of vote: 2.68%

  2. 2 - Below Average (11 votes [4.91%])

    Percentage of vote: 4.91%

  3. 3 - Average (38 votes [16.96%])

    Percentage of vote: 16.96%

  4. 4 - Above Average (80 votes [35.71%])

    Percentage of vote: 35.71%

  5. 5 - Outstanding! (89 votes [39.73%])

    Percentage of vote: 39.73%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#26 Invader Zim

Invader Zim

    Posts: 31
    Joined: 24-March 11
    Member: 16818
    Country: United States

Posted 18 April 2011 - 02:33 AM

Great review!  I finished mine this morning and agree with your pros and cons completely.  The pictures are good, though I have to say even very good pictures can't capture the ship's aura.  It just has a lot of personality that you need to see in person.  

As far as the interior, it is definitely as described, but with the very tall back and the rear sail overhead, it would be hard to notice if the interior was better decorated.  I was going to purchase the Captain's Cabin to spruce up the interior but now I am a bit hesitant since I might never notice again.

In any case it looks great and has a lot of personality.  Given the piece count I think the price is reasonably for a licensed product.  In comparing it to other pirate vessels, as my wife put it "It looks less Mardi Gras and more Halloween".  It looks like a more serious rival for the Imperial Flagship than the BB or BSB in that sense.  :pirate_skel1:

#27 punkkid364


    Posts: 162
    Joined: 12-January 11
    Member: 15358
    Country: United States

Posted 18 April 2011 - 02:52 AM

Great review!  I think I'm going to wait to see the pics of the Black Pearl before I decide whether or not to drop the coin on this set.  I'm glad that the 2x2 flags on the side aren't printed, they're much more useful to me in plain black.

#28 Algernon

  • Not a Doofus

    Posts: 2252
    Joined: 21-January 08
    Member: 2558

Posted 18 April 2011 - 03:07 AM

I'll agree with just about everyone else in saying that the exterior looks fantastic, but the lackluster interior keeps the model from really measuring up to its $120 price tag.

It is a pretty ship though. Thanks for the review.  :thumbup:

#29 Gabe

  • Griffin Master

    Posts: 1499
    Joined: 21-July 10
    Member: 12135
    Country: Australia

Posted 18 April 2011 - 03:11 AM

Thanks for the review, i am hanging out to get this set even more now!  :pir-wub:
Erudhalion Sansael, Admiral of the Kaliphlin fleet. Peregrinus for Kaliphlin!
Posted Image  Posted Image  Posted Image   Posted Image

#30 Dan the Brickman

Dan the Brickman
  • Soft Bluecoat

    Posts: 680
    Joined: 23-April 09
    Member: 5870
    Country: USA

Posted 18 April 2011 - 05:48 AM

Thanks for the review brickster.

I really think as a set, it is better as a parts pack, or a good starting point for someone wanting to build a good ship. But, the original design is just not my taste, and the ship seems a bit overpriced.

As I have a couple pirate ships now, I may just stick to the small sets for the PotC line.


Posted Image

Now Playing Died as the scummy Danielle Barrie in: Escape From Isla Paradisa!

"Beware the great sea monster!!!!"

My Brickshelf Gallery MOC page  ToR Holiday Special!(complete now)

#31 Artanis I

Artanis I
  • Who's Friggin' Dan?

    Posts: 3509
    Joined: 28-May 10
    Member: 10965
    Country: Australia

Posted 18 April 2011 - 06:07 AM

Of course it's a more expensive ship than usual - it's a licensed set!

#32 The Penguin

The Penguin
  • Vodka, Caviar, and Bears on Unicycles!

    Posts: 2271
    Joined: 10-January 08
    Member: 2465
    Country: Russia

Posted 18 April 2011 - 06:12 AM

Posted Image

This one looks pretty much like a demotivator to me!  :laugh:

Seriously, TheBrickster, you did a great job with the review!
Though as some people around I don't really like the ship very much. it's quite nice, detailed, the color-scheme is good as well, but it definitely is overpriced and I can't really see it being used somewhere outcide POTC theme.

Not to mention, that for me personally there are no minifigs that would make this set worth getting. Do I understand it correctly, when i think that it actially has only one esclusive character in it: the Chef, while others can be found in other sets?

Good day, ladies and gentlemen! )  :classic:

Edited by The Penguin, 18 April 2011 - 06:13 AM.

#33 Lego-Freak

  • Online LEGO Store Detective

    Posts: 1225
    Joined: 31-May 07
    Member: 1635
    Country: Switzerland

Posted 18 April 2011 - 06:14 AM

Thanks a lot for your review!  :thumbup:
The interior may be a little lackluster but that doesn't distract from the beautiful exterior  :pir-wub: And the minifigs are top-notch (as always) :pir-laugh:
P.S.: Can you tell me how tall this beauty is? If it's any taller than 50cm my current plans for positioning it on my shelves are doomed  :pir_bawling:

#34 Superkalle


    Posts: 6122
    Joined: 21-December 08
    Member: 4755
    Country: Sweden

Posted 18 April 2011 - 07:23 AM

Thanks TheBrickster. What a great review. An absolute pleasure to read :thumbup:

And I really like the graphics you did to frame it all in. Perfect.

#35 Dadzilla


    Posts: 21
    Joined: 25-March 11
    Member: 16839

Posted 18 April 2011 - 07:27 AM

Great review theBrickster.
Thank you for the pics and feedback.

I may have to pick this one up.  :pir-classic:

#36 Sebeus I

Sebeus I
  • Winner of the Third Tournament of Retribution!

    Posts: 1571
    Joined: 04-September 08
    Member: 3891
    Country: Belgium

Posted 18 April 2011 - 07:29 AM

sure looks cool, the review was very helpfull, I'm a bit disappointed in the minimal rigging but I like the colors of the ship, I will either buy it or wait for the black pearl

Edited by Sebeus Iniwum, 18 April 2011 - 07:30 AM.

Posted Image

#37 KielDaMan


    Posts: 9545
    Joined: 04-February 09
    Member: 5203
    Country: PILIPINAS

Posted 18 April 2011 - 07:37 AM

Excellent review TheBrickster! This really gave me a better appreciation of this much anticipated PoTC set. This might be the non-pirate fan in me speaking, but I do think it's a visually-pleasing set that is really great for display purposes, not to mention the very nice selection of new minifigs. This has been on my buy-list right from the very start, and my decision still hasn't change. If there will be a first Pirate ship that I'll ever own, I'm glad it's going to be this one.

#38 kris kelvin

kris kelvin
  • Bris Bothan

    Posts: 344
    Joined: 20-October 08
    Member: 4192
    Country: Warsaw, Poland

Posted 18 April 2011 - 07:39 AM

The reviev it`s great and the ship it`s great too. Must have for me.
Only one dissapointment is of course stickrs for the glasses  :pir-hmpf_bad:

#39 vader11


    Posts: 27
    Joined: 07-February 10
    Member: 9471

Posted 18 April 2011 - 07:47 AM

It would be great if you can compare it with the #10210 Imperial Flagship.

#40 Keybobs


    Posts: 39
    Joined: 15-April 11
    Member: 17265
    Country: Scotland

Posted 18 April 2011 - 08:55 AM

I'm prety surprised that this set has an overall rating so far of above average and that most of the comments have been not to buy, wait until black pearl or wait for a sale. As I previously mentioned, I'm not a fan of the interior at the back at all nor am I all that pleased with an open cabin or the bland cannon use, but that does not detract me one little bit from the overall delight of the ship itself.

Apart from the IFS, I think this has to be one of the best ships out there now, it's extremely unique and well structured. The lantern definately has the wow factor for me and i'm loving the use of all those bones!

The only major flaw in the theme at the moment, for me, would be the lack of red coats. Hopefully this can be rectified sometime in the future, now that we have the IFS as the Dauntless, perhaps creating the interceptor in the future will balance this out.

I couldn't vote anything less than 5 - Outstanding! just an absolute must have, I wonder if anyone who actually buys the set will be disappointed?

Great review, fantastic photographs, very well presented. It's made me even more excited about recieving my one (should be here by Wednesday YAY)

Thanks for the review TheBrickster.

#41 Alldarker


    Posts: 313
    Joined: 08-November 07
    Member: 2162

Posted 18 April 2011 - 10:02 AM

Nice review!
The Queen Anne's Revenge was definitely one of the sets I was looking forward to most from the PotC line. This review gives a very good and very fair account of what we can expect.
I too am slightly disappointed with the interior of the vessel; it's a bit sparse, without a proper deck, without extra cannons (it really should have that fourth cannon, if not five extra cannons!), and without an enclosed captains cabin.
However, my collection is primarily display based: I won't really be playing with this set, but mostly just admiring it on my shelve. For that purpose, it's an excellent set with lots of attention paid to the exterior details like the bones, skulls, lantern and figurehead. The masts could also do with some more rigging, but all in all none of this can't be fixed once I am able to buy it here in Europe.

WWAD: What Would Alldarker Do?
My Lego collection

#42 The Spark That Bled

The Spark That Bled

    Posts: 64
    Joined: 31-March 11
    Member: 16975
    Country: United States

Posted 18 April 2011 - 12:35 PM

Great review.  I especially thank you for putting the pictures of the Queen Anne's Revenge from the actual movie for comparison.

It looks like a really fun build.

#43 Elander


    Posts: 303
    Joined: 09-July 08
    Member: 3493
    Country: Germany

Posted 18 April 2011 - 01:13 PM

What? Just three cannons? That is a joke. This ship have place for 10 cannons. I don't know. Three cannons without wheels... That is no good sign for the Black Pearl.

Come on LEGO. If your ships get no enough cannons than need your "Pic a Brick" -Onlineshop cannons. And grey or brown cannon-wheels!

:pir-hmpf: Oh-man, Blödhammel!

#44 Canada_7


    Posts: 218
    Joined: 30-August 10
    Member: 12946

Posted 18 April 2011 - 01:33 PM

Awaiting this in the mail whenever B&N ships it out, along with The Mill  :pir_laugh2:  . Any chance you have Brickbeard's Bounty to compare this to (or anyone else that has both ships)? I'm not a pirates guy and the only pirate set I have prior to these POTC sets would be Brickbeard's Bounty.

#45 Bonaparte

  • Christmas Moose

    Posts: 14982
    Joined: 22-June 06
    Member: 822
    Country: Belgium

Posted 18 April 2011 - 02:20 PM

If I would have had this ship during my youth I could have played with it for hours and days. It looks like one mighty evil pirate vessel with a high playability level. As a matter of fact, it looks more evil and wicked than any other Pirate ship LEGO produced so far. Now, being more a builder than someone who 'plays' with LEGO I like this ship for it's many useful new parts and awesome figures. A must buy for any pirate fan and of course for a Classic-Pirates.com Ambassador!

Want to find out more about our Reviewers Academy? Just click the logo.

Posted Image

New Member? Read This | Questions? Need Help? Ask Here

Site Guidelines | Eurobricks FAQ | Visual User Guide

#46 TheBrickster

  • Loved Ghost Ranger

    Posts: 9642
    Joined: 15-January 05
    Member: 174

Posted 18 April 2011 - 05:02 PM

View PostBonaparte, on 18 April 2011 - 02:20 PM, said:

A must buy for any pirate fan and of course for a Classic-Pirates.com Ambassador!

Well - you all heard "The Man".  Well said Bonaparte and I agree with your opinion completely.  I've got her on the fireplace mantle at the moment, replacing an old wooden ship.

Posted Image

The dark red bricks along her sides really "pop" and match the sails nicely.

Her measurements are: 20" high and 26" long, compared to the Imperial Flagship which is 24" high and 29" long.  She's only slightly smaller after measuring.  I may take a side-to-side comparison picture later.

I think someone asked above:

Posted Image

Jack and Angelica's hair pieces are attached to their hats.  Blackbeard's hat is not.

Thank you all for the comments.  She looks much better up close vs. in the photographs shared in this review.

#47 Sheriff von Snottingham

Sheriff von Snottingham

    Posts: 23
    Joined: 27-March 11
    Member: 16886
    Country: Germany

Posted 18 April 2011 - 05:19 PM


thank You for the review! Compared with the early pirate ships 6285 and 6286, I am disapponted that Lego doesn't really spend parts on working out the hull more detailed (the same in set 6243, but 6243 was *really* poor.).
But Queen Anne has some really nice gimmicks (coloured sails, sceleton lantern, figures) making it worth buying. I think I will buy it and then do some modification on it...

Bye, Christian

#48 fred67

  • A builder, not a hoarder

    Posts: 2847
    Joined: 03-December 09
    Member: 8444
    Country: USA (GA)

Posted 18 April 2011 - 05:26 PM

This was on my wish list, but now I am not so sure.  It's great looking, IMO, as a non-pirate fan, but one who got the Imperial Flagship and is a fan of POTC, but I agree that a lack of cannons + none available on PAB is disappointing.  I also would add the decking MOD found elsewhere on EB.

Sort of up in the air now, but I'll probably get it.  I also like the lanterns a lot, and can't figure out if it's a new dish piece or if the dish is over some new piece (there's a flat bottom under the dish)... other than that, I believe I have all the pieces necessary (if not the right colors).
Posted Image Posted Image Posted ImagePosted Image Posted Image Posted Image  Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image

#49 TheBrickster

  • Loved Ghost Ranger

    Posts: 9642
    Joined: 15-January 05
    Member: 174

Posted 18 April 2011 - 05:43 PM


So, how does the Queen Anne stack up against everyone's favorite Imperial Flagship?  Let's take a look.

Three inches shorter in length:

Posted Image

Four inches shorter in height:

Posted Image

Smaller, lighter ship makes her more maneuverable than the Imperial Flagship:

Posted Image

Not a whole lot smaller when looking at them side by side:

Posted Image

From a pigeon's perspective:

Posted Image

And lastly, in battle:

Posted Image

That was fun - perhaps I'll create some battle scenes.  Wow! these ships take some floor space. Now I need some plastic water and some rocks.  I can see how you pirate fans can really get into this. :pir-blush:

#50 SkaForHire

  • Historica's Fortune Teller

    Posts: 3688
    Joined: 04-May 06
    Member: 759
    Country: USA

Posted 18 April 2011 - 06:03 PM


That is a poorly designed ship, and too expensive. I think the BB was much better constructed. That whole back-end does not seem to be functional or very good looking. The red sails are nice, and I like that it is a full sized hull. Three cannons, for four cannon ports? that seems odd. Also, the lack of any kind of deck is odd too.

And the pricing for the line is just terrible. I thought PoP and Indy were a bit high, these prices are ridiculous. No set under 10 dollars might really hurt the line too. I am having a really hard time deciding if I can spend my limited lego money on such an expensive and poorly designed / priced line.

Pro - the minifigures look incredibly awesome.
D.L.T.B.G.Y.D.  Flickr Feed

Admiral Woodbrose, Minister of the Colonies of Corrington

Dugal MacLean of the Kaliphlin Guild ~ "GEAR Up with GEAR CO supplies."

Posted Image                                                         Posted Image                                             Posted Image
Triumphal Arch of Petraea    ...    |    ....          Devil's Island   ......        |    ........       Rakath Mountain Ritual

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

Sponsored Links