Jump to content

REVIEW: 5840 Garden Playmates

  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

Poll: REVIEW: 5840 Garden Playmates (12 member(s) have cast votes)

How would you rate this set?

  1. Poor (1 votes [8.33%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 8.33%

  2. Below Average (6 votes [50.00%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 50.00%

  3. Average (3 votes [25.00%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 25.00%

  4. Above Average (1 votes [8.33%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 8.33%

  5. Cute l'il puppies! (1 votes [8.33%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 8.33%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 Clone OPatra

Clone OPatra

  • Full Frontal Disclosure

    Posts: 5643
    Joined: 21-January 09
    Member: 5070

Posted 25 January 2011 - 04:09 PM

Posted Image

Hello and welcome to what is perhaps the second Belville review ever to hit Eurobricks!  Yes, after you've read my review you have to go search for Seigfried's disturbing Belville review, but for now, it's time to turn your attention toward…

Posted Image

Set Title: Garden Playmates
Set #: 5840
Theme: Belville
Pieces: 87
Minifigures: 1
- Belville style
Year of Release: 1995
Price at Release: USD $20

Buy it? Inventory?  Bricklink  Peeron
Browse the pics, skip the review? (Of course not!) Flickr set


So, this is the second time a chap like me has reviewed a girl set.  

If you found yourself agreeing with the above sentence, you must be horribly sexist.  Though you may not be into the color purple or lot of hearts or cuddly animals, you are (hopefully) into LEGO, and Belville is a wonderful way to get both rare pieces and regular pieces in rare colors.  Not to mention accessories, and some other cool things.

Even though all that is true, I myself would not actually buy Belville, since I don't care much about rare pieces of colors anyhow.  That's where thrift stores come in.  Thrift stores present you with a lot of junk that you never know you needed, and some things that aren't junk but you wouldn't have been willing to pay full price for anyway.  Needless to say, it was a thrift store that delivered this set into my hands for a good price, and made me able to present you with this review today.


The thrift store where I found this set is one of those ones that doesn't even care about its own merchandise, and slaps tape everywhere and writes the price on everything.  Please pardon the ugly tape and price.

I don't really know very much about Belville circa 1995, but I'd guess that this packaging is pretty representative of the whole theme at the time.  It's clearly meant to appeal to girls, with that lovely pastel background and those hearts that dot the purple border.  The set itself also consists of bright colors, and features cuddly puppies.  My sister for one hated cuddly puppies when she was younger, but I suppose girls like them in general?  Maybe some of our female members can share their thoughts.
Posted Image

Before I even get further let me pause to compare this packaging to one from the same era but of a "boy" line (pardon my sexism, but that is how LEGO markets).  Yes, Majisto's Magical Workshop came out two years earlier, but its packaging is representative of the Castle line throughout the '90s.  What strikes me is how comparatively "busy" the Belville box is.  While the Castle set has a plain picture and really not much else, the Belville box has an oddly-shaped border to the picture, plus the hearts.  Did LEGO feel its packaging had to pop more to appeal to girls?
Posted Image

Onto the back.  The photographers themselves must've gotten fed up with that annoying cloth skirt, as they took it off for all of these "action" shots.  Even for a set this simple they made alternate models back then.  How I miss it! (And there are more hearts.)
Posted Image

The different sides were pretty standard for the time; the set name only appears on the top of the box, there's a note that it comes with instructions only for the main model, and there are a few pics.  What is odd, though, is that the box doesn't say "Contents made in…" as most sets did at the time (and still do).  Instead, it merely says "Made by LEGO Systems… Billund, Denmark."
Posted Image


Of course I'm not surprised that the set comes with instructions, but honestly you don't need them.  With only 87 pieces (and some of those are accessories), this set is a as simple as it looks from the boxart.
Posted Image

There are no part call outs or things like that, but the build is so freaking simple that you get some puppy love pictures on every single page spread.  It might not be easy to tell on my picture, but the background is a very light pink.
Posted Image

There are no ads or anything like that, but on the back there is… this  :wacko: So what is that for?  Writing your only little puppy love stories?  I don't get it…
Posted Image


It of course isn't a minifigure as you're used to; it's a Belville style figure, which seems much closer to action figures than normal minifigures due to the level of moulding detail on the head and the numerous points of articulation.

Please note before I show the pictures of her that she is supposed to come with little light violet bows on her feet, which come off of this type of sprue.  Since the set is supposed to come with the sprue, Bricklink lists the girl as wearing the headband from it as well in this set, though none of the boxart or pictures in the instructions show her with the headband.  Unfortunately, I have neither the bows or the headband.

Now onto what I do have.  The girl wearing the skirt is exclusive to this set, but both the skirt and the girl herself come in other sets.  I really find the figure rather ugly.  Her skin color makes her look like she's been spending time in a tanning salon, and her passive face is just a bit creepy.  The skirt is really a nuisance; the elastic on mine is a bit worn out, so the skirt always falls down.  It's pretty enough, but it's annoying as heck.
Posted Image

The drawback is that the girl's crotch area looks really strange without the skirt, but she's just a plastic toy, so what does it really matter.  With thirteen points of articulation, she is pleasantly pose-able.
Posted Image

Since she does have those attachment points for accessories, you can have fun dressing her up.  The plumes don't quite fit into her feet, though.
Posted Image

I also noticed that this size figure is the realistic size for normal minifigure accessories, which are always charmingly way out of proportion to normal minifigures.  I love the hugeness of normal accessories, but they look good against an appropriately scaled figure as well.
Posted Image


Another important aspect of the set is the animals, since it couldn't be called "Garden Playmates" if the girl had nothing to play with (that sounded wrong).

We get the big black dog, two identical puppies in a playful pose, and the printed parrot that was quite common.  Both types of dogs only ever appeared in Belville sets, and thus aren't very common.  Though the moulds are nice enough, without any printing the dogs look rather strange.  It isn't too bad on the puppies, though, since they have some expression in their blank faces.
Posted Image

The lack of printing is much worse for the big dog.  Since his mould is pretty simple, the fact that there is nothing on his face makes him rather scary, or at least unimpressive.  This dog mould did come with some different printed patterns which give it much more character.
Posted Image

How big is this dog, you wonder?  Well, it's about the same size as the newish cow.  If you want to create MOCs in normal scale with giant dogs, this is certainly the way to go.
Posted Image


What would a Belville set be without great accessories?  For some reason, the yellow case that I got came with the stickers on it that it features in Prize Pony Stables, but not in this set, I don't think.  The baby bottle is nice but not too wonderful, but I love all the plates and brushes I can get (especially in "medium green").  And then the bucket… No way!  They won't even chrome a lightsaber handle these days, and they chromed a freaking bucket?!  Awesome…
Posted Image

The case does open up, and can hold some of the other accessories, though only one at a time.
Posted Image


For once, I felt I could actually lay out all of the parts for you (though I forgot the green bush).  Yeah, there sure aren't very many, but there are some lovely bright colors that you don't see too often any more.  Please note that both sets of flowers are supposed to be that lighter shade of pink, but one of the ones that I got is what Bricklink calls dark pink.
Posted Image

You're supposed to learn from your students when you teach, and so I was inspired by Brickdoctor to use this technique of giving the amounts of each part for my interesting parts pic.  The sink isn't very rare, but it is pretty nifty, and I always like curved pieces and arches.  The gate is actually two parts, and it meshes wonderfully with the eight light violet fence pieces.  The dark pink roof pieces are great as well.
Posted Image


Since you could build this set blindfolded, build pictures would certainly be extraneous.  So let me proceed directly to the "model," if you could call it one.

Though it's really simple, the finished set does invoke a sunny, warm feel.  With the outdoor sink and palm tree, it gives me a strong Florida vibe.  For those who might not know, Florida is just a very relaxed, warm and mildly humid state, in my mind anyway.  Also, you won't see the parrot anywhere in this picture.  The instructions forgot about it.
Posted Image

Even a model so simple can have design flaws.  Who knew, right?  I'm talking about the lack of fencing under the little doggy hut.  I know that LEGO sets often have open backs, but this seems like the kind of set that shouldn't.
Posted Image

It only gets worse from the back.  Why did the designer not decide to add fencing all around?  It's not like you couldn't have played with it if there was fencing in the back as well, and without it the model just seems unnecessarily unrealistic.  The chair is nice, though.
Posted Image


Since there isn't much going on in this set, I felt I might as well show off what a kid might actually want to do with it in order to better understand it.  It also gives me a way to highlight a few more design flaws.

First, the girl shows up at the doggy area to play with her favorite little puppies.  "How aw woo doing today, Mistew cuddwes?"
Posted Image

The girl then decides to check and see if the doggies have enough water, but since she is way too tall for their hut she smashes her head into it.  "%@&#!"
Posted Image

Seeing that the dogs have left her some 'special treats,' the girl carries them out in the shiny bucket.  "Ew."
Posted Image

After such dirty work, she needs to clean herself up.
Posted Image

She suddenly has the urge to climb the tree.  "Polly want a cracker?"
Posted Image

Meanwhile, the adult dog decides it's time to escape their annoying playmate, and she ushers her puppies out of the unfenced portion of their pen.
Posted Image


Well, from this example I'm really not all that impressed by Belville.  Apparently LEGO feels that girls wouldn't want actual models to build before playing with, so the company throws just enough pieces together to be able to still call it a LEGO set.  It's great that there are some cool pieces in cool colors and nice accessories, but overall the set is a disappointment.  This set feels worth ten bucks tops; twenty is too much.


Parts: 7/10 - The parts that you get are pretty nice, but there really isn't that much there.
Design: 6/10 - If the pen was completely enclosed, there would be nothing wrong with the design.  But the way it's left open is lame.
Minifigures: 6/10 - She's ugly, and the skirt is annoying.  She can pose, though.
Price: 5/10 - Twenty bucks?  No way LEGO.
Playability: 7/10 - I can see this set keeping kids involved for a little while, but there aren't enough parts to rebuild it into anything exciting and faceless dogs have to get boring after a bit.

Overall: 6.2/10 - That's a pretty poor score where I come from; a 'D' grade.  Belville just really isn't worth it, but if you happen to come across a set or two of it for dirt cheap, then be my guest.

Until next time!

Edited by WhiteFang, 25 January 2011 - 05:05 PM.

Posted Image

#2 WhiteFang


  • Beep beep!

    Posts: 16482
    Joined: 31-December 07
    Member: 2351
    Country: Singapore

Posted 28 January 2011 - 03:10 AM

Thanks Clonie for doing a review which is rarely noticed, including myself. It is nice to know that this purchase is a bargain. Apart from the incredible rare accessories like the chrome bucket ( :wub: ), there is nothing "wow" for me to shout about as a playset point of view and I meant AFOL viewpoint. I am not sure if our daughters will enjoy building this but for us, this is a rare parts pack instead and I will not pay the full retail price for it.

My BrickLink Store // Sign up for Reviewers Academy // Trains & Town Reviews // Black Knights Kingdom (EBRP) // Watch out EB News!

Click here to find out more about WhiteFang

New Member? Read This | Questions? Need Help? Ask Here

Site Guidelines | Eurobricks FAQ | Visual User Guide

My name is Wilhalm Bloodaxe and I am back to be part of the Ragnarök Now Redux.

Lord Kenneth Valise, Level 1 Knight, 28yrs old human
Power: 4 Health: 10/10 Gold: 10
Inventory: One potion, a Greatsword (WP: 3) and a Shield (SP: 2)

#3 prateek


  • Study hard!

    Posts: 10415
    Joined: 09-July 05
    Member: 426
    Country: Canada

Posted 28 January 2011 - 03:20 AM

Great review. I was actually tempted to get the new horse jumping set to see what Belville was like, but I decided against it. This set is okay, but definitely not worth the original $20 price tag.

#4 KielDaMan


    Posts: 9541
    Joined: 04-February 09
    Member: 5203
    Country: PILIPINAS

Posted 28 January 2011 - 03:22 AM

Great review CloneyO! This is actually the first time I've seen a Belville review, and it's quite nice to see the various 'elements' included in this oft-forgotten sets. I guess I'm just not really a fan of this not-so-typical Lego theme, so I'd rate this as Below Average. But it was really enjoyable reading through your well-written review as always. :thumbup:

NEW! Legends of Chima Review: 70008 - Gorzan's Gorilla Striker

Posted Image

Currently playing as the Sheriff Kenneth Emanuel in Tamamono's Silver City Mafia

My Eurobricks Page / My flickr / My MOCpages

#5 Dreamweb


  • Thanks for your contributions!

    Posts: 1643
    Joined: 28-June 05
    Member: 396
    Country: Poland

Posted 28 January 2011 - 08:44 AM

Nice review. Those Belville sets are often a good source of valuable parts, while their overall design is not that appealing, especially to those of us who prefer System LEGO. I for one think Belville is not bad, and the figures are pretty cool. But I consider them part packs rather than actual sets, and their original price is too high. That's why I voted average.

#6 Lordofdragonss


    Posts: 1992
    Joined: 16-February 09
    Member: 5310
    Country: Poland

Posted 28 January 2011 - 09:27 AM

I remember when I get this set... I still have the small black dog and may parts of this...
I spend hour to playing with it and ths set is a lot better than the newest Belville doghouse...
High Chief Of Agriculture of Avalonia
Avalonian Orc Commander

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users