Aalak, on 26 February 2011 - 02:48 AM, said:
As mentioned, I started to re-rigg her this week. Some of the new rigging-lines gave the masts more stability. Using the Snot-platforms and a lot more of
http://img.bricklink.com/P/1/4081b.gif makes her stable, too. I used 124 for the rigging so far. Next step: "cross-side" rigging. I'm still not sure, if I gonna glue or knot them together. Some more sneaks from my handy-cam.
Ok, well to make it short: If I were you, I'd have waited with the rigging until all the masts and proportions are as good as possible, ideally "perfect". I say that because I'm afraid your masts are way too high.
This is another graphic of the famous HMS Trincomalee in Hartlepool. It's been shown in this thread a couple of times; and I also had the honor to visit her quite lately, pictures will come when I have the time
But back on topic: as you can see the main mast is about as high as the length at the waterline. Actually that's quite a lot, when I visited her I was quite amazed. The main mast's top is 46,6m above the deck. But at the same time the overall length (driver boom to flying jib boom) is 82,3m. In other words: the ship is significantly longer than high. The only historic ship with exceptionally high masts is USS Constitution, but she's not in her original condition of 1812 and neither a "true" nor a typical frigate.
In other words: I think there's no way you can keep your masts as high as they are now, also aesthetically. Of course things a are a bit different on a Lego model. For instance the prefab hulls and the oversized minifigures make the hull appear more clumsy than on a model that is to scale. Hence higher masts are a natural solution to make up for that; and yes, they are about 20% too high on Achille too.
But yours are even higher than that. I think the main mast should have it's royal yard a bit lower than where the topgallant yard is now. On top of that there would only be the flagtop, a thin bar piece like the lightsabre one, but longer. And of course all the other masts would be somewhat lower than that even; the foremasts slightly lower, the mizzen much lower.
I'm not you, but that's my opinion.
I'd also like to add that she's looking really, really good apart from that.
Now onto the headrails: I am very fond of what you have done there so far, but there's still some fine-tuning that you could do.
That's the headrails of Guerrière, an older design than on Achille, but I think it's easier to figure out where the 3mm hose goes. As you can see, the vertical hose parts are all attached to the hose parallel to the prow. The part in the middle isn't attached anywhere but on it's ends and is just for decoration as is the horizontal hose above the holes that are used for the anchor cables.
If you're having trouble bending the hose, just bend them a little too much and it will come back where you wanted it initially. Hope that helps.
Aalak, on 26 February 2011 - 02:48 AM, said:
P.S. I tried to estimate the time I used to build the Ares and the little nameless ship so far... I was shocked... 150h, with 3 complete rebuilds so far ...

Apparently you have more time available than I do, at least the last 2 months! That also explains why you've been so extraordinary fast in your progress!
Great progress, I'm curious how this will look when finished!