Jump to content


Different minifig hair from 1979?


8 replies to this topic

#1 davee123

davee123

  • Rant Summarizer


    Posts: 450
    Joined: 22-January 09
    Member: 5088
    Country: United States

Posted 09 October 2009 - 12:14 AM

So, in the new "LEGO Book", there's a picture on page 37 of a doctor minifig, supposedly from 1978*.  Looking closely at his hair, it's different than the "standard" male hair piece!  Quickly, I had to look this up to see whether the standard male hair had changed sometime after 1979 (when it was first available)!  After looking around, there were a few instruction scans that show photographs of these hair pieces, the best one being this one from set 675 Snack Bar:

Posted Image

All the photos we could find from 1979 appear to have this type, including catalogs:

Posted Image

So... what gives? Did these images get taken of prototype parts that were never released? Did sets back then actually have slightly different hair pieces?  If so, when did they change?  And why am I just learning this now?  And why won't the Eurobricks forum software recognize the image tags unless it has a .jpg/.gif/.png/etc extension?!

DaveE

* He's actually NOT from 1978.  He's not from anywhere.  According to BrickLink and Peeron, that torso didn't come out until 1980, and never was used with blue legs.

#2 avoidz

avoidz

    Posts: 40
    Joined: 19-November 07
    Member: 2202

Posted 09 October 2009 - 01:47 AM

Your image links don't work for me (keeps saying 'Cookies must be Enabled on those images), but I looked the Snack Bar 675-1 up on Peeron.

I think you are probably right about the prototype hair part, unless someone knows otherwise. I've had LEGO since the late 1970s and never seen that hairstyle piece.

Edited by avoidz, 09 October 2009 - 01:50 AM.


#3 CP5670

CP5670

  • In search of litmus paper


    Posts: 2481
    Joined: 02-February 08
    Member: 2646
    Country: United States

Posted 09 October 2009 - 03:52 AM

I think there are actually two different hair pieces you are referring to. The one in the catalog looks like a more textured version of the usual male hair with square sideburns, while the snack bar one is like the pigtail hair piece without the pigtails.

#4 Rick

Rick

  • Subtle like a hammer


    Posts: 7836
    Joined: 11-February 09
    Member: 5261
    Country: The Netherlands

Posted 09 October 2009 - 06:43 AM

The 'bigger' version only shows up in the early instruction manuals and box art after the introduction of the piece. I own various sets of that era and I only have the standard male minifig hair piece still in use today. So, I always assumed that this means that the final design wasn't completed yet when they were making the instruction manuals and box art. As suggested, Lego may have used the pigtail hairpiece as a basis for the early prototypes.

#5 Tom Bricks

Tom Bricks

  • Video Games Reviewer


    Posts: 833
    Joined: 29-April 09
    Member: 5938

Posted 09 October 2009 - 10:31 PM

I know what your talking about actually. In the ultimate Lego book there is a pic of a fig with this hair, and it says the date and "first minifigs" or something. I would love to have some of these but I have never seen them in real life.
You can call me Tom
Posted ImagePosted Image Posted ImagePosted Image Posted ImagePosted Image
Flickr
“Tell me one last thing,” said Harry. “Is this real? Or has this been happening inside my head?”
“Of course it is happening inside your head, Harry, but why on earth should that mean that it is not real?”

#6 holviala

holviala

    Posts: 1
    Joined: 12-October 09
    Member: 7796

Posted 12 October 2009 - 07:21 PM

I have the remains of 675 and it has the standard 70's LEGO hairpiece. I've never even seen the one in the cover (and I've built LEGO since 1976 or so).

#7 samthelegoman1

samthelegoman1

    Posts: 573
    Joined: 10-July 08
    Member: 3499
    Country: USA

Posted 13 October 2009 - 09:16 PM

I looked the snack bar up on Bricklink, and it shows 2 pictures of the box withe the strange hairpiece, and 1 picture doesnt have it.
Also, the inventory lists it as having a normal male hairpiece

#8 davee123

davee123

  • Rant Summarizer


    Posts: 450
    Joined: 22-January 09
    Member: 5088
    Country: United States

Posted 13 October 2009 - 10:54 PM

The picture from The Ultimate LEGO Book and The LEGO Book do appear to be the same.  They're using the black hairpiece, so it's hard to tell, but as has been suggested, it DOES look faintly like it's the pigtail piece with the actual pigtails removed.  The one in the Snack Bar makes this a bit more obvious with the small, light-colored blotch where the pigtail would normally protrude, plus the fact that it's in brown, so it's more visible.

So, yeah, I'm going to go with the guess that they used pigtail pieces with the tails cut off as the prototype male hair piece, and somehow they got into the actual pictures that were taken for certain sets, catalogs, etc.  If it really had been a different element, chances are SOMEONE on BrickLink would've sold it by now.

DaveE

#9 Rick

Rick

  • Subtle like a hammer


    Posts: 7836
    Joined: 11-February 09
    Member: 5261
    Country: The Netherlands

Posted 14 October 2009 - 06:59 AM

View Postdavee123, on Oct 13 2009, 11:54 PM, said:

The picture from The Ultimate LEGO Book and The LEGO Book do appear to be the same.  They're using the black hairpiece, so it's hard to tell, but as has been suggested, it DOES look faintly like it's the pigtail piece with the actual pigtails removed.  The one in the Snack Bar makes this a bit more obvious with the small, light-colored blotch where the pigtail would normally protrude, plus the fact that it's in brown, so it's more visible.
This thread has really been an eye-opener on this issue. I should have seen that on my own...  :blush:  Indeed on the snack bar instructions/box art its quite clear that they've altered the pigtails hair piece. The lighter spot is clearly visible.

Quote

If it really had been a different element, chances are SOMEONE on BrickLink would've sold it by now.
I'm waiting for it to appreciate in value... :grin:



Reply to this topic



  


0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users