Sinner, on Jul 6 2008, 02:52 AM, said:
As it turns out, this issue was discussed recently
Right or wrong, it isn't your place to point out peoples "mistakes". Since you have no authority here it is more likely to cause problems than solve them.
Actually, I did read that thread, that's actually why I posted what I did in the first place. I thought it wasn't ok to post in three year old topics, as it was said in the thread you pointed out.
I won't point out mistakes any more.
WhiteFang, on Jul 6 2008, 03:12 AM, said:
Dark Sword Ragnarok, I will like to let you know what is my course of action of reviving certain threads since you specify "me" in it.
By reviving certain threads and bringing into the lights again, is supposed to benefit others new members whom have missed it, joined much later, or have something valuable and constructive comments to add. For me, whether to take my "title" as a compliment or not, I believed it's clearly mentioned clearly in this entry
I believe in reviving certain threads which has values in it. If there is no values within the open topics, I am supposed the threads are supposed to be close.
As what Sinner had mentioned, this had been discussed before. Please read through the thread. Thanks.
I read the thread, thanks. I am sincerely sorry about dragging you into this, WhiteFang.
I didn't mean to insult you in any way.
Lt. Col. Thok, on Jul 6 2008, 06:43 AM, said:
Ouch, that got really ugly really fast. But, on a more positive note...
I believe that XWY made a better TIE than Lego could, would and did. Good job.
Yeah, I guess it did, didn't it?
I agree, XWY did make a great TIE back then.
Again, I sincerely apologize if I insulted anyone here, I didn't intend to.
Edited by Dark Sword Ragnarok, 06 July 2008 - 09:24 PM.