8421 Crane Boom issue
#1
Posted 15 November 2012 - 03:11 PM
I am wondering what the owners, and I'm sure there are a lot of them on this forum, that have the 8421 Crane use to keep the boom up when extended. The 2 cylinders just don't seem to have the power to keep the boom up and in the morning the boom has crashed down. It drives me nuts and nothing seems to work to keep the boom up for a length of time, like say many hours. I have tried about everything I can think of, I've checked to make sure all the hoses, valves and cylinder openings(for the air) are very tight, but apparently they still leak some air overnight, same thing goes for the 8455 Loader, you can't keep the backhoe digger on the rear straight up, it just sinks slowly. Any ideas?
Thanks, Eric
#2
Posted 15 November 2012 - 03:15 PM
MY YOUTUBE

WINNER OF 2010 TECHNIC CHALLENGE
TOP 100 OF 2013 TECHNIC CHALLENGE
OWNER OF THE LIMITED EDITION EXCLUSIVE 41999 MODEL
#4
Posted 15 November 2012 - 03:43 PM
as Zblj said, air will alway leak somewhere, most probably from the cylinders directly (from the high pressure to the low pressure compartment) - the hoses are pretty much tightly sealed to the plastic enclosures of the pneumatic elements. Had the same issue - and in reality you have that as well. Re-pressurizing the system is the way out. Not straight forward to implement, but entirely possible: First you have to detect the pressure loss. Since there are no off the shelf LEGO pressure gauges you need to have a sensor somewhere. In case of your boom it could be a touch sensor mounted in a way that is pressed or released immediately after some downward movement. Hook that up to any of the LEGO intelligent bricks, attach a motor to drive a pneumatic pump, favorably feed the air into a tank as buffer reservoir and hook that up to the main pressure line.
You could also build a pressure gauge from a cylinder, a shock absorber providing the counter force, and a switch. In that case you could adjust the trigger point in a way that the boom doesn't even move at all.
Lot of work for just that (and somewhat costly) - but it is close to reality and fun to watch.
Or use, as Zblj suggested, LA's
Regards,
Thorsten
#5
Posted 15 November 2012 - 06:39 PM
Yeah sounds like a lot of work and expense. I'm not really great at modifications unless they are spelled out clearly in instruction form, have lots of pneumatic parts, but nothing like what you are talking about, sounds more like specialized parts...guess I'll just deal with the stock build and re-raise the booms on those 2 models. I actually considered trying some kind of prop, like those flexible hoses used in some sets to block up the cylinders, may help, just have to get the right lengths cut.
Thanks, Eric
#9
Posted 15 November 2012 - 07:21 PM
http://store.firgell...ts.asp?Cat=1822
Its possible it wont be strong enough to hold the HAN boom in which case I will double them up. The best part about these accuators is that they feature the motor as well as the accuator so its not as expensive as it seems.
Ill let you know how it goes. I hated that I couldn't leave the 8421 "on display", and I lack the ability to create a decent working version of opposed LA's.
#10
Posted 15 November 2012 - 07:39 PM
If you want to lock your model with the boom raised, just make the axles at the end of the actuators longer and attach some Technic beams to them to hold the length (see image below). If you don't want to make the lock link so long, just attach it further back on the boom instead (2nd image).


I just thought of one final solution which uses the pin holes on the sides of the pneumatic actuator brackets. I like this one the best. Unobtrusive appearance if you use yellow.
Edited by Blakbird, 15 November 2012 - 08:03 PM.
#12
#13
Posted 15 November 2012 - 10:10 PM
nychase, on 15 November 2012 - 08:41 PM, said:
Technic Gearhead, on 15 November 2012 - 09:28 PM, said:
Not really,if you are good at cad its not hard.
#14
Posted 16 November 2012 - 01:48 AM
Alasdair Ryan, on 15 November 2012 - 07:15 PM, said:
You can find it Here.
Alasdair Ryan, on 15 November 2012 - 07:15 PM, said:
You can find it Here.
#16
Posted 16 November 2012 - 09:54 AM
One odd thing is I have the 8421 and 8455 as you do and both the boom and back how will drop over time, however, my 8862 will hold any position for as long as you like. It must be to do with the forces acting on the rams, anyway good luck
#19
Posted 16 November 2012 - 08:21 PM
TechnicFreak, on 16 November 2012 - 03:56 PM, said:
#20
#21
Posted 16 November 2012 - 11:59 PM
Toastie, on 15 November 2012 - 03:43 PM, said:
as Zblj said, air will alway leak somewhere, most probably from the cylinders directly (from the high pressure to the low pressure compartment) - the hoses are pretty much tightly sealed to the plastic enclosures of the pneumatic elements. Had the same issue - and in reality you have that as well. Re-pressurizing the system is the way out. Not straight forward to implement, but entirely possible: First you have to detect the pressure loss. Since there are no off the shelf LEGO pressure gauges you need to have a sensor somewhere. In case of your boom it could be a touch sensor mounted in a way that is pressed or released immediately after some downward movement. Hook that up to any of the LEGO intelligent bricks, attach a motor to drive a pneumatic pump, favorably feed the air into a tank as buffer reservoir and hook that up to the main pressure line.
You could also build a pressure gauge from a cylinder, a shock absorber providing the counter force, and a switch. In that case you could adjust the trigger point in a way that the boom doesn't even move at all.
Lot of work for just that (and somewhat costly) - but it is close to reality and fun to watch.
Or use, as Zblj suggested, LA's
Regards,
Thorsten
#22
Posted 17 November 2012 - 09:33 PM
Bricktrain, on 16 November 2012 - 11:59 PM, said:
Hi Bricktrain,
yeah saw manometer in Seepos's breath taking Peterbilt thread- for the first time. Thanks for the link!
What I meant though was a switching functionality - as far as I know the manometer does not have that, right? But Alasdair Ryan has shown in the very same thread how to get that, entry 7. This is a very elegant solution - no PBricks required at all, I love it.
Regards,
Thorsten
#23
Posted 17 November 2012 - 09:57 PM
Toastie, on 17 November 2012 - 09:33 PM, said:
Alasdair Ryan has shown in the very same thread how to get that, entry 7. This is a very elegant solution - no PBricks required at all, I love it.
Regards,
Thorsten
Who's he?
Sheepo used springs instead of rubber bands in his truck,that design that I posted was taken from Jennifer Clark's page.
Edited by Alasdair Ryan, 17 November 2012 - 09:57 PM.
#25
Posted 18 November 2012 - 04:03 PM
efferman, on 16 November 2012 - 10:31 PM, said:
That's not a bad idea, would work on the 8421 at the very least, possibly the 8455's backhoe arm too...thanks to all for the ideas...gives me some thoughts, I've had both sets since 2005 and it just bothers me that the cylinders on the backhoe arm drop and the boom on the 8421, you want realism as most real cranes leave their booms in the upright position and backhoe/loaders always leave their booms up when not in use...
Reply to this topic
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
















