47 replies to this topic

[Calabar]

With the creation of the new Index for the Official Topic, we need a better organized topic to manage all the updates.

Rules

• Report the version of LDD the sets have been updated to.
  
• Report a comma separated list of the sets you have upgraded. Add any note that could be helpful.
  
• Make the set's number clickable to easily access to the updated post.
  
• Remember to fix old posts using the last version of the topic rules, if necessary.

Notes

• An updated set have to be saved with the new version of LDD and re-uploaded.

Example
Calabar
Sets Updated to LDD 4.2.5
6075, 6040 A, 6040 B, 6061, 6067, 6073, 6074, 6085. (all my Castle Sets)

[Stephan]

Sets updated to LDD 4.3.5:
9467, 4000005.

Edited by Stephan, 23 September 2012 - 02:05 PM.

[Calabar]

Stephan, on 21 September 2012 - 06:24 PM, said:

Sets updated to LDD 4.3.5:
9467 The Ghost Train, 4000005 Kornmarken Factory 2012.

It is not necessary to report set's data, set's number is enough!  

[Banjo]

I've fixed all the Alien Conquest sets (best as can be done right now) that were posted by another user a while back here (updating them with the parts that were obviously missing when they made them). What's the proceedure for posting such a thing? They're not MOCs but the original builder still did the initial work and I'd at least want to acknowledge when reposting the fixed versions of sets.

[marco9999]

Set updated to LDD 4.3.5:

7065

Thank you Banjo for the useful hint!

Edited by marco9999, 22 September 2012 - 06:54 AM.

[Calabar]

Banjo, on 22 September 2012 - 06:24 AM, said:

I've fixed all the Alien Conquest sets (best as can be done right now) that were posted by another user a while back here (updating them with the parts that were obviously missing when they made them). What's the proceedure for posting such a thing? They're not MOCs but the original builder still did the initial work and I'd at least want to acknowledge when reposting the fixed versions of sets.

Hi.
The procedure is described among the rules of the Official Sets topic, here.  
Look for [Sets created by other users].
For any other question, you can contact me in private.

[Banjo]

marco9999, on 22 September 2012 - 06:51 AM, said:

Set updated to LDD 4.3.5:

7065

Thank you Banjo for the useful hint!

Glad my work came in useful. I'm a HUGE Alien Conquest fan, and the glorious Alien Commander was the reason I worked on all that! :)

I just downloaded your updated version and noticed his gun still needs switching to "Metallic Silver" colour, though? It's just a shame we still can't finish the Mothership right thanks to that train track part bug, eh? :(

I've updated all the other Alien Conquest sets done by P4trickvH and sent a PM (best I could make out from the "rules" at the start of the topic regarding altering existing LDD files) to see if he'd be updating his old versions or if I should upload my "fixed" ones.

[Sjuip]

LXFs updated to LDD 4.3.5:
7248, 10224, 7898
Remarks:
- Set 7428: treads 71372 now do fit on rims 32007
- Set 10224: White Beard 93223 & Female Wig 93562 corrected as they are now in LDD
- Set 7898: Bug with Buffer 45708 (reported here) is now fixed – the buffer  now fits onto the 9V Train Motor correctly.

All my other LXFs (77 in total) have been checked, they work OK in LDD 4.3.5 and no amendments are necessary (any remarks, missing bricks or missing decorations still remain valid LDD 4.3.5).

EDIT: so all my sets listed up to today can be considered updated to LDD 4.3.

Edited by Calabar, 23 September 2012 - 03:20 PM.

[Calabar]

Sjuip, on 22 September 2012 - 04:26 PM, said:

All my other LXFs (77 in total) have been checked, they work OK in LDD 4.3.5 and no amendments are necessary (any remarks, missing bricks or missing decorations still remain valid LDD 4.3.5).

You mean that ALL your sets can be considered updated to LDD 4.3?
If you confirm that, I will update the database (but please modify the post above as reference... you don't need to list all sets, anyway).

[Sjuip]

Calabar, on 22 September 2012 - 05:19 PM, said:

You mean that ALL your sets can be considered updated to LDD 4.3?
If you confirm that, I will update the database (but please modify the post above as reference... you don't need to list all sets, anyway).

@Calabar: Affirmative, I have opened all lxf's that I've posted in here with LDD 4.3.5 and they all turned out OK (no alarm bells). I checked all sets that have missing parts or bugs/problems, and only with the three sets listed separately it turned out that previously missing parts could now be added or that previous bugs/problems were now solved. So only for that three sets I have provided new LXF's and pictures. The others are OK as-is, so do not need an updated lxf, do they?

BTW, I'm glad you're not asking me to list them ALL . That would be the true disadvantage of being among the Top-10 contributors...

[Calabar]

Sjuip, on 22 September 2012 - 06:44 PM, said:

[...] The others are OK as-is, so do not need an updated lxf, do they?

Damn... I didn't thought about that.
I can't report these sets as LDD 4.3 if the file reports a different version. It could be a problem for future verifications.
Is it complex for you to update the lxf files at least? Brickshelf should allow massive upload using zip files.

Sjuip, on 22 September 2012 - 06:44 PM, said:

BTW, I'm glad you're not asking me to list them ALL . That would be the true disadvantage of being among the Top-10 contributors...

Ehehe in this situation it could be a problem. The important thing is that the updated sets results clearly from your post (and "all my sets" is enough to help me for the modification of the database).
I could even easily add the list later.

[Sjuip]

Calabar, on 22 September 2012 - 07:34 PM, said:

I can't report these sets as LDD 4.3 if the file reports a different version. It could be a problem for future verifications.
Is it complex for you to update the lxf files at least? Brickshelf should allow massive upload using zip files.

OK, I see your problem. Here's the deal: I will update the other lxf the coming days. I will let you know in this thread when the job is complete. Then you can amend that wonderful   new index. OK?

[Toa_Of_Justice]

Toa Of Justice
Sets Updated to LDD 4.3.5
6200, 6202, 6293, 6217, 6227. (all of my 2012 Hero Factory sets; in one post)

[Sjuip]

Calabar, on 22 September 2012 - 07:34 PM, said:

I can't report these sets as LDD 4.3 if the file reports a different version. It could be a problem for future verifications.
Is it complex for you to update the lxf files at least? Brickshelf should allow massive upload using zip files.

As promised, all my entries (yes, ALL of them ) are now updated to LDD 4.3.5 / BrickSetVersion 835.3.
Additionally, entries for two sets have been amended to include the newly added Crane Bucket 3492c01 (now in LDD under no. 75172):
4565, 4645

[Calabar]

Sjuip, on 23 September 2012 - 01:40 PM, said:

As promised, all my entries (yes, ALL of them ) are now updated to LDD 4.3.5 / BrickSetVersion 835.3.

Very Good!
I modified your original post to highlight that (I need to distinguish discussions from updates at a glance!)

[AndyC]

I've been through all mine and made sure they work in 4.3.5, brick version 835.3 (correcting any minor issues I can - mostly giving horses a face!) I'll go through more thoroughly over the next few weeks making any other improvements I can with any newer bricks/decorations.

[Tore M]

Sets updated to LDD 4.3.5:

8110, 8041, 8049, 8065, 8066

Edited by Tore M, 30 September 2012 - 06:44 PM.

[ADHO15]

Okay... at long last, all of my Star Wars sets should be updated to LDD 4.3.5!
... complete with all improvements and errors (I hope).

I'm sorry, but I'm not going to list and link every set here. I'm sure it'd be easier for you to just change all the ~ to - anyway, so I'd just be wasting A LOT of my time.

Please let me know if you spot any I've missed and I'll update them ASAP.

[Calabar]

ADHO15, on 12 December 2012 - 11:05 PM, said:

I'm sorry, but I'm not going to list and link every set here. I'm sure it'd be easier for you to just change all the ~ to - anyway, so I'd just be wasting A LOT of my time.

Tilde and minus are not used to indicate LDD version anymore. The new index is different
Anyway, "all star wars sets of ADHO15" is enough good to perform a fast query that insert the correct data inside the index.

[ADHO15]

Calabar, on 13 December 2012 - 01:54 AM, said:

Tilde and minus are not used to indicate LDD version anymore. The new index is different
Anyway, "all star wars sets of ADHO15" is enough good to perform a fast query that insert the correct data inside the index.

Oh of course. I forgot that.
Great, thanks!

PS. That includes magnet sets, minis, games, etc.

Edited by ADHO15, 13 December 2012 - 08:29 PM.

[ADHO15]

All Western sets updated to LDD 4.3.5.
Some numbers/names might need changing in the index.

[Calabar]

@ADHO15
I've checked Set's names and it seems they are correct.
Can you specify the problematic sets?

[ADHO15]

Calabar, on 20 January 2013 - 12:22 AM, said:

@ADHO15
I've checked Set's names and it seems they are correct.
Can you specify the problematic sets?

Just the second set of numbers for those sets released twice. The names are probably right if you're using Bricklink. I use Brickset since that's where the instructions are.

[Tore M]

7685 updated to LDD 4.3.5

[PeabodySam]

I have checked compatibility with all my sets.  Here are the specific ones that needed to be updated; the rest are all fine.

Updated to LDD 4.3.6:
5887, 7298, 6479, 6740 (A and B Models), 6772, 4790, 6774, 5883, 5955 (B Model), 7297, 7476, 5987 (C Model)