Lego technic challenge 2012
Posted 06 September 2012 - 01:55 PM
Edited by jorgeopesi, 06 September 2012 - 01:56 PM.
Posted 06 September 2012 - 02:04 PM
AFOLs think the same but Lego want to buy sets and a more complex crawler than the 9398... it will be too expensive... no benefits...
Posted 06 September 2012 - 02:14 PM
will we see some of our genius builders in the finals?
how avoid plagiarism with the older crawlers of mahjiga, zblj and sariel
if old mocs are be allowed?
will a third party tire disqualify the moc? it would be a wonder if not.
Rc or not?
how complex could it be
so many questions. i think i want see the rules first
Posted 06 September 2012 - 02:15 PM
Posted 06 September 2012 - 02:20 PM
Posted 06 September 2012 - 02:36 PM
Posted 06 September 2012 - 02:50 PM
And in the end we are the ones who will chose the winner.
There will be allowed other parts than those in the set, as log the rules are obeyed.
All the details will be known still this month.
Posted 06 September 2012 - 05:21 PM
Posted 06 September 2012 - 05:57 PM
PLEASE CLICK ON TEXT/IMAGE TO VISIT MY VARIOUS SITES
NEED A REAL MODEL DIGITIZED IN LDD? CONTACT ME!
Posted 06 September 2012 - 06:40 PM
There was a lot of speculation about the VIP promotion that LEGO did recently and all the questions were answered once the website for the promotion went live. I have no doubt the same applies here.
Posted 06 September 2012 - 06:49 PM
Also you're assuming that MOCs made previously can be submitted, but forgetting that might be some rule preventing it, to know when the rules will become published.
We'll have plenty of time to make some decent models.
Posted 06 September 2012 - 08:48 PM
Posted 06 September 2012 - 09:08 PM
These 2 points are exactly what I was thinking as well... The original 9398 Crawler is probably going to be around for quite some time...
Posted 06 September 2012 - 09:23 PM
My Brickshelf<would be a shame if nobody clicked on this here link
Posted 06 September 2012 - 09:38 PM
Reply to this topic
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users