Carribean Clipper vs the Imperial Flagship
#26
Posted 04 December 2007 - 03:32 AM
#28
Posted 04 December 2007 - 08:42 AM
#29
Posted 04 December 2007 - 09:13 PM
Mister Phes, on Dec 4 2007, 02:29 AM, said:
Well, I've seen the Clipper do better elsewhere...
Pe *wub* ace treaty? I like the Imperial Guards just as much as the soldiers!!! *wub*


"Mr. Nowhere" John Doe >:] | Bruno Bear, the watchmaker | Sassy Cooter | Scar Mimitsus >:] |
First Officer Commander Cameron Walters :3 | Casey Cat, Puuurfect painter | Sveinn, the Uninspired :3 | Scouty | L'il Scouty | Langston Lionheart >:]
#31
Posted 04 December 2007 - 09:57 PM


"Mr. Nowhere" John Doe >:] | Bruno Bear, the watchmaker | Sassy Cooter | Scar Mimitsus >:] |
First Officer Commander Cameron Walters :3 | Casey Cat, Puuurfect painter | Sveinn, the Uninspired :3 | Scouty | L'il Scouty | Langston Lionheart >:]
#32
Posted 28 March 2008 - 01:23 PM
Better colour scheme of the sails, better stern structure. A true classic!
#33
Posted 28 March 2008 - 02:06 PM
Any respectable admiral wouldn't be seen dead in sails painted with cannons!
#34
Posted 28 March 2008 - 03:33 PM
The Carribean Clipper has a second mast in its back section, but there's no sail fixed on it. What's the use of a mast without a sail?
I have spread my dreams under your feet.
Tread softly because you tread on my dreams.
From: "He Wishes for the Cloths of Heaven" by W.B. Yeats







#35
Posted 28 March 2008 - 03:35 PM
legotrainfan, on Mar 28 2008, 03:33 PM, said:
The Carribean Clipper has a second mast in its back section, but there's no sail fixed on it. What's the use of a mast without a sail?
I'm boiling the tar now :)) Maybe the sail is not needed due to high winds... ;)
#36
Posted 28 March 2008 - 04:21 PM
Edited by dukeschunke, 28 March 2008 - 04:22 PM.
#37
Posted 31 March 2008 - 03:24 PM
I like it, its nice and simple ship. The Imperial Flagship doesnt have a good cabin or structure.
Have you ever noticed looking at the Caribbean Clipper, the troops Tricornes make there heads look Tiny?

God save the gracious King,
Long live the noble King,
God save the King:
Send him victorious,
Happy and glorious,
Long to reign over us:
God save the King.
![]()
#38
Posted 03 April 2008 - 05:56 AM
Regards, Captain Zuloo :-D

Brick Expo 2011 - Australia's BIGGEST LEGO Expo!
www.brickexpo.com.au
#39
Posted 06 April 2008 - 05:28 PM
The sleeker hull makes for a better proportioned ship, it has Imperial guards, which I like more than the Imperial soldiers, and the Clipper seems a bit empty.
And of course the Flagship has some great sails and a compass, so my vote goes to the Imperial Flagship.
#40
Posted 01 September 2008 - 04:23 PM

"Introduce a little Anarchy, Upset the Established Order, and Everything becomes chaos!"
"Only the devil and I know the whereabouts of my treasure, and the one of us who lives the longest should take it all." -Edward Teach
“Lego from BrickLink comes in small plastic bags....... So Does Drugs.” -Captain GreenHair
#41
Posted 01 September 2008 - 09:16 PM
#42
Posted 19 October 2008 - 05:49 PM
It's multifunctionomical.
![]()
Flickr
#43
Posted 31 December 2008 - 10:24 PM
I have both ships but I still go for the CC its BIGGER! and a better crew! For all we know that pirate on the
flagship could be a spy!
#44
Posted 01 January 2009 - 01:57 AM
My LDD Navy:
HMS Panther-16 guns
HMS Monarch-10 guns
HMS Colossus-40+ guns
HMS Conquest-32 guns
go to my Brickshelf
and all in the name of the brick...
#46
Posted 13 September 2009 - 05:55 AM
Later on, I have bought both 6285 and 6286 from ebay that I missed when I was small. But I havent thought of buying a caribbean clipper. I feel no interesting at all.
Fair enough, the flagship is better than the clipper, but the barracuda is better than the schoonner.
The 89 and 92-93 pirate line, each won once.
But if for voting "good guy ship", I will prefer adding the armada flagship too.
For me, the imperial and armada flagship show very close quality. They will be the real one that difficult to decide which is better.
Armada's appearance is better, but generally weaker as a"flagship": just 1 cannon, less bricks (and also just 3 men).
They are really very close, so, I own them both.
Edited by Lord Augusta, 13 September 2009 - 10:02 AM.
#47
Posted 13 September 2009 - 10:15 AM
LEGO has a trend that offering fewer and fewer minifigs in their set: clipper in 89 =5, imperial flagship in 92 = 4, finally armada flagship in 96 just 3.
Not only pirates line, also in others such as castle.
So I think it ll be a bit not fair by judging a ship is better just because it has more men. And ,you know, minifigs can be added as many as you want by the owner.
I prefer voting a "ship" by focusing its design, appearance, firepower, etc, which are "really owned by the ship".
However, for sure you can focusing on the number of minifigs if we are comparing "sets". It's a matter of comparing "ship" and "set" and I think we are voting for "ship" in here, arent we?
Edited by Lord Augusta, 13 September 2009 - 10:16 AM.
#48
Posted 13 September 2009 - 02:00 PM
Modern favorite: Race for the Stolen Treasure (X5 and counting)
Set list on Brickset
flickr
#49
Posted 13 September 2009 - 02:07 PM
Lord Augusta, on Sep 13 2009, 12:15 PM, said:
LEGO has a trend that offering fewer and fewer minifigs in their set: clipper in 89 =5, imperial flagship in 92 = 4, finally armada flagship in 96 just 3.
CC and IF both have 4 minifigs
#50
Posted 13 September 2009 - 03:20 PM
no victory without suffering,
no freedom without sacrifice.
Reply to this topic
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users



















