Brickbeard's Bounty better than Queen Anne's Revenge?
#1
Posted 10 January 2012 - 10:12 PM
As one who owns and has built all 12 of the official Lego ships I regard the QAR as being one of the better ships and the BB as much more in the middle of the pack. When compared to the QAR the BB is cartoony, has no front deck, has toothpicks holding up the sails, is smaller and contains far less detail. The only thing I see that is better is that the rear cabin is enclosed but its other deficiences outweigh that one plus in my mind.
So I am curious, do you like the BB better than the QAR and if so why? Or have I gotten the wrong impression?
www.thelegochronicler.blogspot.com
#2
Posted 10 January 2012 - 10:14 PM
#3
Posted 10 January 2012 - 10:29 PM
Captain Blackbeard, on 10 January 2012 - 10:14 PM, said:
Do you have any pics of that? I built mine last night and I have to say I love it! The ship itself is fantastic but could do with a few improvements but thats just my personal taste.
As for BB, it's a set I dont own but was seriously considering buying. I love the shape, I love the closed cabin and I love the minifigs much more than the ones that came with the QAR. The only reason I now probably wont buy it is because i've recrewed my QAR with lots of classic pirates figs and will be modding the ship to suit my personal tastes and having two pirate ships and no imperial vessals seems silly!
Edited by charlieboy, 10 January 2012 - 10:31 PM.
#4
Posted 10 January 2012 - 10:47 PM
My camera isn't working, but the upgrades are simple; The grey 2 by 4 plates above the cannon portholes (they'll only have four studs poking out), you can put platforms spanning the gap between port and starboard, but the bone railings will have to have black bricks put underneath them, so that they're at normal railing height (not the old height, which is really high, just 1 brick underneath each slant piece with bones), but leave an area around the main mast so it's not obstructed.
note; There will not be enough headroom in the gun deck for a minifig to stand
Also, when you've completed adding the deck, you can put cannons poking out between the gaps in the bone railing
#5
Posted 10 January 2012 - 10:47 PM
Captain Blackbeard, on 10 January 2012 - 10:14 PM, said:
Yeah I must confess that my affinity for the QAR is partially due to the modifications I did to it. I added a hold beneath the front deck, enclosed the captain's cabin and added a galley beneath the back in a manner similar to the Imperial Flagship.


Edited by TheLegoChronicler, 10 January 2012 - 10:48 PM.
www.thelegochronicler.blogspot.com
#6
Posted 10 January 2012 - 11:10 PM
#7
Posted 10 January 2012 - 11:29 PM
#8
Posted 11 January 2012 - 12:07 AM
Edited by Napoleon53, 11 January 2012 - 12:08 AM.

PS3 ID: Jamako53 (I havez teh Blak Opz!)
#9
Posted 11 January 2012 - 12:18 AM
The design on the QAR sails is amazing, also. Crossed swords under a crown, what could be better?
Edited by Captain Blackbeard, 11 January 2012 - 12:20 AM.
#10
Posted 11 January 2012 - 12:40 AM
Captain Blackbeard, on 11 January 2012 - 12:18 AM, said:
The design on the QAR sails is amazing, also. Crossed swords under a crown, what could be better?
And the QAR sails don't have a honking ugly copyright thumbing your eye.

PS3 ID: Jamako53 (I havez teh Blak Opz!)
#11
Posted 11 January 2012 - 01:46 AM
Napoleon53, on 11 January 2012 - 12:40 AM, said:
Gotta admit I haven't noticed it, 'til you mentioned about it hehe
#12
Posted 11 January 2012 - 06:47 AM
TheLegoChronicler, on 10 January 2012 - 10:12 PM, said:
Is the BB truly regarded by this community as being a better ship than the QAR? And if so why?
You will see that this community has very different opinions about it as well, I'll show you,
Captain Blackbeard, on 10 January 2012 - 10:14 PM, said:
So you see, my opinion is the complete opposite of Captain Blackbeard's and yet I call on the same argument that he calls on to justify his choice,
the only sensible thing I can say about this is that there is no better ship, the ships are not so different, it are the people who make the difference.
Now as for my presonal opinion about the QAR versus the BB,
I prefer the QAR as well, the sail plan is superior to the one of the BB and the sails itself are a lot nicer as well (and on that point I'm on the same side as Captain Blackbeard
Edited by Sebeus Iniwum, 11 January 2012 - 06:49 AM.
#13
Posted 13 January 2012 - 02:22 AM
#14
Posted 13 January 2012 - 11:09 AM
Captain Becker
"An Admiral a day, keeps the Doctor away" General Skalldyr in ToR II
<---- Thank you so much joey Bluecoats FTWThank you Jebediahs
#15
Posted 13 January 2012 - 05:09 PM
-BB's has a really cool poop deck. QAR's stern is a bit empty. One point to BB
-QAR's sails are much better than BB's(BB's sails are terrible). One point to QAR
So, for me:
BB: 2
QAR: 1
I prefer BB, then. By the way, I think QAR has 12 pockets, so it could have 6 or 12 cannons...but it has only 3...too bad.
#16
Posted 13 January 2012 - 05:43 PM
Captain Roger, on 13 January 2012 - 05:09 PM, said:
...
Captain Blackbeard, on 13 January 2012 - 02:22 AM, said:
Now,
TheLegoChronicler, on 10 January 2012 - 10:12 PM, said:
I could be wrong but perhaps you confuse the Black Seas Barracuda with the Brickbeard bounty (BSB - BB)
both ships have the same colors of sails so it's very possible,
Personally I would spot the difference instantly, the BSB is superior to the BB in every aspect (IMO).
Anyway, I think a lot of members here prefer the black seas barracuda over most other ships.
#17
Posted 13 January 2012 - 06:30 PM
Sebeus Iniwum, on 13 January 2012 - 05:43 PM, said:
Design-wise, I think only the newest Imperial Flagship is better than the BSB - though I think several ships generally have a better color scheme, as I'm not too fond of the yellow and, especially, old grey in it. I prefer the colors of both the BB and the QAR to the BSB by far.
#18
Posted 14 January 2012 - 09:46 PM
Sebeus Iniwum, on 13 January 2012 - 05:43 PM, said:
If we talk about realism, QAR has lots of skeleton ornaments...this is not realistic. By the way I don't understand why that smaller poop deck is more realistic for such a tall cabin
#19
Posted 14 January 2012 - 09:48 PM
Besides, it looks good!
#20
Posted 14 January 2012 - 10:28 PM
Captain Roger, on 14 January 2012 - 09:46 PM, said:
the higher a deck is located, the thinner it is, check out other galleons and see for yourself.
Now ofcourse the official lego ships generally don't care much about the tumblehome, the prefab hulls are already a hystorically unaccuracy when used for a waterline model so I suppose it's not usefull to take this quality into considerations when discussing official LEGO ships
#21
Posted 15 January 2012 - 12:54 AM
#22
Posted 15 January 2012 - 01:30 AM
Got Questions? Need help? New member?
Read the site guidelines | Index of helpful tutorials | Eurobricks FAQ

#23
Posted 15 January 2012 - 08:08 AM
Captain Blackbeard, on 14 January 2012 - 09:48 PM, said:
Besides, it looks good!
QAR.. according to the movie, or to some official images on the internet, hast indeed lots of skeletal ornaments, or hanged skeletons.., but not in the places 4195 lego QAR has..it doesn't bothers me much, but it could certainly be better placed.. fortunately, it brings enough material for us to make the neccesary mods :P
Edited by Yawgmoth, 15 January 2012 - 08:11 AM.
#25
Posted 16 January 2012 - 03:10 AM
Reply to this topic
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users











