Worst set ever: Space edition
#1
Posted 15 October 2012 - 02:55 AM
Anything's fair game; just try to avoid picking one of the countless $2.99 throwaway sets (like one of the "flying planks"), since they're not really designed for the wow-factor anyway. Stick to the "main" lines of sets if possible.
My pick: http://brickset.com/detail/?Set=7691-1
I actually liked the Mars Mission line (particularly the second wave), but that set is just an eyesore. I was suckered into picking it up and trust me, it's much worse in your hands than it is on the box.
Sound off! What's your vote for the worst Space set in existence?
#2
Posted 15 October 2012 - 03:06 AM
#3
Posted 15 October 2012 - 06:05 AM
However, the smokey-grey cockpit, the trans baby-blue "containment pod", the contrastive light and dark grays, blues, neon-oranges, yellows, light-blue suits and puke green aliens was a mouthful as it was an eye-ful. I understand there exists sets much more poorly designed in Space, but this one in particular kept me drooling at its cool design cues as it kept me at a distance because of its mashed-up colors. The tacky stickers and uninspired alien craft also weighed in for me.
I suppose you could say it was the worst color-choice design for a set, as unfortunately much of Alien Conquest was in my eyes. The prototype trans-yellow windscreens would have suited the ADU much better, in my opinion.
Edited by Apollo, 15 October 2012 - 06:07 AM.

"I believe in what I see, I believe in what I hear; I believe in what I'm feeling, changes how the world appears."
Rush
#4
Posted 15 October 2012 - 10:19 AM
-== Classic LEGO trains are the best ==-
Do you need replacement stickers for LEGO (reproductions and customs): ministickers.nl
#5
Posted 15 October 2012 - 02:22 PM
Edited by Blacktron, 15 October 2012 - 02:26 PM.
#6
Posted 15 October 2012 - 02:33 PM
Flickr Photostream | Dropbox - LDD files and instruction archive
The SVG Decals Library - Discuss on EB | Contribute on GitHub
#7
Posted 15 October 2012 - 04:34 PM
http://www.brickset....ail/?Set=5980-1
That set could have (and should have) been a whole lot more. It didnt look great on the box but I bought it just to complete the collection. The small ships were poorly developed and the base had no cohesive functioanlity with the small ships. It was probably designed to hit a pricepoint more than anything else. Not a bad parts pack, I guess.
#8
Posted 15 October 2012 - 06:10 PM
It's basically a box with wings, two satellite dishes and an antenna stuck on it, with a nuclear reactor pod above the pilot's seat.
My MOCpages
Galaxy Squad Set Suggestions
#9
Posted 15 October 2012 - 06:43 PM
http://brickset.com/detail/?Set=2151-1
Probably the biggest afterthought in the whole Space library. The line only had four sets, and introduced some very strange new molds. Some of the printed parts are very rare and quite cool (especially trans-neon diver helmets), but the robot designs are pretty bizarre. The Robo Stalker, at least, is kind of cool.
Edited by Algernon, 15 October 2012 - 06:44 PM.
#10
Posted 15 October 2012 - 07:02 PM
Edited by DraikNova, 15 October 2012 - 07:02 PM.
My MOCpages
Galaxy Squad Set Suggestions
#12
Posted 15 October 2012 - 08:15 PM
DraikNova, on 15 October 2012 - 07:02 PM, said:
I have one more contender to add: this massive disappointment deserves mentioning as it was one of my most anticipated sets from Space Police and wound up being the worst. So many flaws with the design, I don't even know where to begin. It's doubly disappointing since Space Police 3 is one of my all-time favorite Space themes.
#13
Posted 15 October 2012 - 10:38 PM
snefroe, on 15 October 2012 - 07:21 PM, said:
I found the entire Mars Mission line rather successful in both design and function. There were a couple of sets that were not of my partiality, e.g. 7647 Switch Fighter, however I think that design-wise, the second wave was a fantastic wrap-up to the theme. Consider and compare 2008's legendary 7649 Ultra-Drill Walker to the excellent, yet flawed 7699 Armored Drilling Unit of 2007.

"I believe in what I see, I believe in what I hear; I believe in what I'm feeling, changes how the world appears."
Rush
#14
Posted 15 October 2012 - 10:48 PM
Algernon, on 15 October 2012 - 06:43 PM, said:
http://brickset.com/detail/?Set=2151-1
Probably the biggest afterthought in the whole Space library. The line only had four sets, and introduced some very strange new molds. Some of the printed parts are very rare and quite cool (especially trans-neon diver helmets), but the robot designs are pretty bizarre. The Robo Stalker, at least, is kind of cool.
~Insectoid Aristocrat

Sylph Solanum: Level 21 Druid
Here's my Flickr account.
/|\_M_/|\
|
#15
Posted 15 October 2012 - 11:23 PM
It's no wonder Space was replaced by Star Wars right after those three themes, and didn't show up again for several years.
The content of the above post is Copyleft 2012, Hikaro Takayama, all wrongs reserved.
"Hufflepuff Badger just takes what he wants..."
#16
Posted 16 October 2012 - 12:38 AM
I love me some classic space but not all were winners. It like the less fun version of:
http://brickset.com/detail/?Set=6926-1
which is not good to begin with.
-Tohst
#17
Posted 16 October 2012 - 01:24 AM
But my eye keeps coming back to the Mars Mission sets. They were more recent, so days gone by aesthetic does not apply. They had that horrible cramsicle color scheme. Truly yech aliens. And the thing that puts them at the top or rather bottom of the list, these were the first attempts by TLG to really start blending the elements and features of their technics and Bionicle lines into one of there more traditional system lines, and the fitness just wasn't there yet. We complain about plated over technic beams in SW sets and huge open spaces etc. these sets were the worst offenders.
http://brickset.com/detail/?Set=7644-1
I know some love this set. But I always find it as an example of too much going on, and the cramped and crowded use of all the technic stuff just doesn't hold up over time.
http://brickset.com/detail/?Set=7690-1
Another example of how much disparate ideas they could pile into one disjointed set. Tons of technic, an almost interesting looking ship, but then orange tubes and nerd rockets everywhere. Kind of a mess.
And then we have what is possibly one of the absolute worst space sets eve, from the Life on Mars theme. The infamous Solar Explorer. Looks pretty on the box, until you realize that there really is nothing there. It's just a beam with a piece of sail wrapped flimsily around it.
http://brickset.com/detail/?Set=7315-1

My First Real MOC!
Almost ready for customers! Comics, Karate, and brutally painful Dentistry, all under one roof!
#20
Posted 16 October 2012 - 04:20 AM
Same goes for the Alien Conquest mothership. For what's supposed to be the main imposing ship for the aliens, all we got was a big, bubbling saucer with an outer ring of railroad. I'll admit, it's a great parts pack, but again, for a mothership, I expected a little more, since the ADU easily has them beat in terms of a home base.
#21
Posted 16 October 2012 - 04:55 AM
Amset-Rah, on 16 October 2012 - 04:20 AM, said:
Same goes for the Alien Conquest mothership. For what's supposed to be the main imposing ship for the aliens, all we got was a big, bubbling saucer with an outer ring of railroad. I'll admit, it's a great parts pack, but again, for a mothership, I expected a little more, since the ADU easily has them beat in terms of a home base.
Yeah... while those sets left a lot to be desired, I really don't know if they deserve to be called the worst sets ever.
#22
Posted 16 October 2012 - 02:16 PM
My MOCpages
Galaxy Squad Set Suggestions
#23
Posted 16 October 2012 - 05:58 PM
If history is to change, let it change! If the world is to be destroyed, so be it!!
If my fate is to be destroyed................ I must simply laugh!!!
MOCpages:
http://www.mocpages.com/home.php/99432
#24
Posted 16 October 2012 - 07:19 PM
#25
Posted 16 October 2012 - 07:43 PM
Reply to this topic
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
















