Jump to content


Architecture Contest: Hagia Sophia


53 replies to this topic

#26 Artizan

Artizan

    Posts: 543
    Joined: 11-June 08
    Member: 3274

Posted 05 April 2012 - 12:56 PM

thanks for the comments again:)

Quote

With regards to putting it on Cuusoo my gut feeling is that Lego won't be making any sets of overtly religious buildings any time soon! Although maybe the fact that it's now a museum means that that wouldn't be an issue.

I know religious things are not on Lego's list to do, but since this building had been both a church and a mosque, and is a museum now, there is a chance that Lego will consider making it a set.
Posted Image
If you want to see Age of Empires 2 Lego sets be produced, then support!:http://lego.cuusoo.c...deas/view/52276

#27 Niku

Niku

  • Wants two initials


    Posts: 1435
    Joined: 26-December 10
    Member: 14912
    Country: Guatemala

Posted 05 April 2012 - 04:15 PM

At first your LDD design was great, but it really improves completely on the actual bricks. Another level totally.
This is my favorite construction, I would love to buy it.  :thumbup: :classic:

Posted Image


Spoiler


#28 Brickmaestro

Brickmaestro

    Posts: 52
    Joined: 14-October 11
    Member: 20953

Posted 05 April 2012 - 05:07 PM

Really nice work - wonderful interpretation of the unique shapes of this magnificent structure. Perhaps the only consideration to something I might tweak would be making the spires more individual and different since that is one of the unusual defining traits of the complex. Just a thought.
Tashbaan the Nomad - Kaliphlin Guild Allegiance

#29 Slick Willie

Slick Willie

    Posts: 33
    Joined: 23-February 12
    Member: 26870

Posted 06 April 2012 - 08:32 PM

I'm glad the screwdriver idea worked out for you.  The cone spires by themselves definitely left the model with an unfinished look, but now they look complete.

Kudos on your final choice of colors.  I don't think you could have done anything else to your model to make it any better.

Congratulations!  Best of luck in the Competition.

#30 jojojo

jojojo

    Posts: 7
    Joined: 02-March 12
    Member: 27081

Posted 06 April 2012 - 11:29 PM

beautiful work

#31 Artizan

Artizan

    Posts: 543
    Joined: 11-June 08
    Member: 3274

Posted 08 April 2012 - 11:07 AM

View PostSlick Willie, on 06 April 2012 - 08:32 PM, said:

I'm glad the screwdriver idea worked out for you.  The cone spires by themselves definitely left the model with an unfinished look, but now they look complete.

Kudos on your final choice of colors.  I don't think you could have done anything else to your model to make it any better.

Congratulations!  Best of luck in the Competition.
Yeah, screwdrivers really worked for me, thanks for the suggestion:)
Posted Image
If you want to see Age of Empires 2 Lego sets be produced, then support!:http://lego.cuusoo.c...deas/view/52276

#32 brick god

brick god

    Posts: 32
    Joined: 16-July 11
    Member: 19072
    Country: USA

Posted 08 April 2012 - 03:46 PM

One of my favorite entries. Its amazing how much detail you were able to include at such a small scale. Id buy it! Good luck in the contest!
Posted Image

#33 Artizan

Artizan

    Posts: 543
    Joined: 11-June 08
    Member: 3274

Posted 13 April 2012 - 11:58 AM

Hello fellow Eurobricks members, 2 days ago staff contacted me for the reason that my entry looked like a digital render instead of real buildings, and has asked me to send another photo against a more "real" background such as a window, so I took this picture and sent it:
http://farm8.staticf..._fd0b91ff14.jpg

But the staff is not convinced enough and asking me to send more pictures, for the REASON I AM DOING WELL IN THE VOTING THREAD, which means I wouldn't be forced to take pictures if my entry did not get much votes. I find this very frustrating and I have decided to ask the opinions of other members, especially contestants instead of sending more pictures. What do you think? Isn't the photo real enough? Is anyone else being asked to do such thing? Should I be removed from the contest? Please share your honest thoughts.

-artizan
Posted Image
If you want to see Age of Empires 2 Lego sets be produced, then support!:http://lego.cuusoo.c...deas/view/52276

#34 L@go

L@go

  • Awesome Sport!


    Posts: 1497
    Joined: 18-March 10
    Member: 9962
    Country: Norway

Posted 13 April 2012 - 03:07 PM

I'd love to see some more pictures. To me, your pics could just as well be high-quality renderings - there's something a bit 'unreal' about them, regarding the shadows, the reflections, and the colours. I'm completely open to that being down to chance, and it's entirely possible that they're totally legitimate, so I absolutely don't want to accuse you of cheating. But then again, I don't understand why it would be a problem for you to submit some additional pictures (it's not hard to take pictures of poorer quality)...

Posted Image   Posted Image   Posted Image   Posted Image   Posted Image   Posted Image   Posted Image


flickr


#35 kciR

kciR

    Posts: 131
    Joined: 09-January 10
    Member: 8981
    Country: The Netherlands

Posted 13 April 2012 - 03:17 PM

I go with L@go, I also though it were hd- renders (if it's true, they are excellent), but who am I to judge you on that topic.
If your build is real, it's not that much work to take it, for example, outside and shoot some pictures.
And otherwise, order the bricks and build it :) As you're chances are that high in winning the competition.
But I think the rules are clear, saying that only brick build entries allowed.

(I hope I don't cut myself in my fingers by giving my opinion)

#36 Hinckley

Hinckley

  • I am not a control freak


    Posts: 28821
    Joined: 15-September 05
    Member: 486
    Country: Chicago, USA

Posted 13 April 2012 - 04:01 PM

View PostArtizan, on 13 April 2012 - 11:58 AM, said:

Hello fellow Eurobricks members, 2 days ago staff contacted me for the reason that my entry looked like a digital render instead of real buildings, and has asked me to send another photo against a more "real" background such as a window, so I took this picture and sent it:
http://farm8.staticf..._fd0b91ff14.jpg

But the staff is not convinced enough and asking me to send more pictures, for the REASON I AM DOING WELL IN THE VOTING THREAD, which means I wouldn't be forced to take pictures if my entry did not get much votes. I find this very frustrating and I have decided to ask the opinions of other members, especially contestants instead of sending more pictures. What do you think? Isn't the photo real enough? Is anyone else being asked to do such thing? Should I be removed from the contest? Please share your honest thoughts.

-artizan
You could've continued the polite conversation our staff had started with you. Rufus, who is running this contest, and doing a very good job at it, simply brought forward the concerns and asked you to prove that your entry doesn't violate the rules. If it's a render, it's an excellent creation, but it is against the rules that clearly state "no digital entries." Plain and simple. I'm not sure why you needed to bring this to the public instead of continuing an amicable discussion with Rufus. I think this is very clearly a render. Sorry to say, I think you've violated the rules of the competition and am not sure why you are taking this attitude towards it. Yes, you are close to winning in votes. The contest organizer's job is to make sure that your entry is valid. The reason it has been brought to our attention is because you are doing well in the voting thread, but the reasons for the question is the violation of the rules, which falls on you. Perhaps nobody would've noticed or it wouldn't have become an issue if you weren't doing well, but you are and now it's been brought to our attention and you don't seem able to prove that it is not a rendering. It's a beautiful model, though. You are truly creative and talented. I would love for you to build the actual model and enter the contest validly. But, please don't get angry with us or try to make us look unfair because you violated the rules and got caught. That is very disrespectful to us.

Got Questions? Need help? New member?


Read the site guidelines | Index of helpful tutorials | Eurobricks FAQ


Posted Image Posted Image


#37 Artizan

Artizan

    Posts: 543
    Joined: 11-June 08
    Member: 3274

Posted 13 April 2012 - 06:36 PM

If you are expecting me to confess that it is a digital entry, then no, I will not, but I have decided that I will not be accepting any prizes if I make it to the top 5, because I did not enter the contest for the prizes. However I ask you not to disqualify my entry and let people vote for it as long as the voting continues, and if I get a place you can give the prize to whoever gets the most votes after me.
Posted Image
If you want to see Age of Empires 2 Lego sets be produced, then support!:http://lego.cuusoo.c...deas/view/52276

#38 Matija

Matija

  • Frisbee headbounce orchestra


    Posts: 105
    Joined: 23-May 08
    Member: 3180
    Country: Norway

Posted 13 April 2012 - 07:20 PM

Ok, you wanted our honest thoughts, so here are mine.

First of all - if the model is indeed real, it definitely deserves the first place and prize.

However, if it is not, no matter how good it is, it just doesn't deserve it (neither the prize, nor the place!) and should never have been in the voting thread in the first place (pun intended). I do understand that there are concerns, especially since it is getting so many points - these points could have gone to other people whose models DO comply with the rules (assuming that yours is a digital rendering).

I have to agree with the others - your pictures do look like very good renderings (and there are many details pointing to that conclusion), and the dark picture didn't really help (on the contrary). If it is not a rendering, it would have been very simple for you to just send a good non-photoshopped picture to Rufus privately, and everything would have been solved nicely and quitely. With such an attitude, no matter what the truth is, I just can't force myself to believe you.

#39 caperberry

caperberry

    Posts: 346
    Joined: 24-February 12
    Member: 26894
    Country: UK

Posted 13 April 2012 - 07:25 PM

You've asked opinions from other EBers, and both replies have suggested you simply take some more pics. I agree with them.


I'm a contestant and also I gave your model two votes, whereas I gave 5 other people one, i.e. I made the point that yours was the best, because it is an excellent design at small scale that was well presented. Right now I feel angry and stupid at the prospect of POSSIBLY having voted for an entry that broke the rules, when I could have given votes to two other entrants who followed the rules.


If it is real, simply send some more pics of it to the mods. If it is a render, please just do the right thing and withdraw. It will still be an excellent design that has received a lot of attention which many people would like to build or own.
Posted Image
I'm running a microscale architecture competition! First prize: a copy of 4000010 LEGO House

#40 Hinckley

Hinckley

  • I am not a control freak


    Posts: 28821
    Joined: 15-September 05
    Member: 486
    Country: Chicago, USA

Posted 14 April 2012 - 02:31 AM

View PostArtizan, on 13 April 2012 - 06:36 PM, said:

If you are expecting me to confess that it is a digital entry, then no, I will not, but I have decided that I will not be accepting any prizes if I make it to the top 5, because I did not enter the contest for the prizes. However I ask you not to disqualify my entry and let people vote for it as long as the voting continues, and if I get a place you can give the prize to whoever gets the most votes after me.
Sounds like a very fair compromise and what Rufus was suggesting in our discussions. Thank you.

And thanks to Rufus for taking his time to host the contest and iron out all the little details. You've displayed an excellent example of diplomacy, fairness and patience throughout and I'm glad you're on staff. :thumbup: Artizan, it's a very beautiful design. The tops, really.

Got Questions? Need help? New member?


Read the site guidelines | Index of helpful tutorials | Eurobricks FAQ


Posted Image Posted Image


#41 caperberry

caperberry

    Posts: 346
    Joined: 24-February 12
    Member: 26894
    Country: UK

Posted 14 April 2012 - 02:19 PM

View PostHinckley, on 14 April 2012 - 02:31 AM, said:

Sounds like a very fair compromise and what Rufus was suggesting in our discussions. Thank you.

To be honest, I'm surprised at this compromise but if that is what was offered to Artizan then I respect the decision and especially the hard work of Rufus and admins. I didn't understand Artizan's point about only being asked because he was doing well, but it now makes sense. Yes, now that time has passed and convincing photos not supplied, I am certainly in agreement that he should not get a prize.
I don't wish to stir the hornet's nest now a resolution has been reached, but seeing as this all made me angry, I need to get off my chest that for me as a contestant and supporter of Artizan's entry it leaves a bitter taste in the mouth about the competition, as the moral question of whether his votes should be reallocated will be left unanswered. But I'll just have to compromise too. Posted Image Like Artizan, I did not enter for the prizes (damned nice as they are!!) - otherwise I'd have chosen a well-known building. So when I get a vote I just feel wonderful. When I see Artizan listed in the final results I know I will wonder where those votes could have gone and how happy it would have made contestants feel to have that support, especially lower-scoring ones.
Posted Image
I'm running a microscale architecture competition! First prize: a copy of 4000010 LEGO House

#42 Spencer_R

Spencer_R

    Posts: 55
    Joined: 27-June 10
    Member: 11691
    Country: USA

Posted 14 April 2012 - 06:46 PM

View Postcaperberry, on 14 April 2012 - 02:19 PM, said:

I don't wish to stir the hornet's nest now a resolution has been reached, but seeing as this all made me angry, I need to get off my chest that for me as a contestant and supporter of Artizan's entry it leaves a bitter taste in the mouth about the competition, as the moral question of whether his votes should be reallocated will be left unanswered.

I agree that the images have a render-like appearance to them, but are they actually renders? If you zoom in closely, some of the parts - especially the small elements like the cheese slopes and 1x1 tiles - display alignment imperfections. It seems to me that is a sign of a real brick built model. So if that is the case, then I am having a difficult time understanding why a compromise was needed rather than an outright resolution.

I don't like the idea that this great contest is drawing to a close with this question not really being answered or that the winners list may end up with some sort of asterisk.

Edited by Spencer_R, 14 April 2012 - 06:50 PM.

Spencer R.

Flickr Mocpages

#43 CarsonBrick

CarsonBrick

    Posts: 93
    Joined: 20-March 11
    Member: 16725

Posted 16 April 2012 - 07:20 AM

I've been reading up on the conversation and I think I have found something that might prove it's a render. I honestly have nothing against you "Artizan" and I think the build is really terrific but I have to do what's fair. The screwdriver piece used on top of the cone appears to be light bley, although it only comes in dark bley, dark grey, and black. I'm not sure if I'm right or not but it just appears to be light bley. Again, I just wanted to point that out. Also, I just found that there is no 6x8 plate in dark green.

Here's the Bricklink: http://www.bricklink...tem.asp?P=6246a
Dark Green Plate: http://www.bricklink...=P&catString=26

Edited by CarsonBrick, 16 April 2012 - 07:23 AM.

Posted Image Posted ImagePosted ImagePosted Image

#44 L@go

L@go

  • Awesome Sport!


    Posts: 1497
    Joined: 18-March 10
    Member: 9962
    Country: Norway

Posted 16 April 2012 - 10:32 AM

View PostCarsonBrick, on 16 April 2012 - 07:20 AM, said:

I've been reading up on the conversation and I think I have found something that might prove it's a render. I honestly have nothing against you "Artizan" and I think the build is really terrific but I have to do what's fair. The screwdriver piece used on top of the cone appears to be light bley, although it only comes in dark bley, dark grey, and black. I'm not sure if I'm right or not but it just appears to be light bley. Again, I just wanted to point that out. Also, I just found that there is no 6x8 plate in dark green.

Here's the Bricklink: http://www.bricklink...tem.asp?P=6246a
Dark Green Plate: http://www.bricklink...=P&catString=26

While I still think the images look rendered, I don't think you're proving anything. The screwdrivers could just as well be dark bley, and the plates are clearly 6x10, not 6x8. The 6x10 plates exist in dark green.

Edited by L@go, 16 April 2012 - 10:33 AM.

Posted Image   Posted Image   Posted Image   Posted Image   Posted Image   Posted Image   Posted Image


flickr


#45 caperberry

caperberry

    Posts: 346
    Joined: 24-February 12
    Member: 26894
    Country: UK

Posted 16 April 2012 - 11:54 AM

I think Carson is right that they are intended to be light blay, but L@go is right that it won’t prove anything; in fact discussion of ‘real or rendered’ may just feed Artizan’s self-justification of entering a digital model. They say a picture tells a thousand words, but they also say actions speak louder than words. Artizan’s actions last week left me in no doubt of his guilt. I’m not normally one to judge, but as a contestant and (humiliated) voter for his model, I feel qualified to.

I’m interested in thoughts on this hypothetical situation; the winners are announced, Artizan gets a place but no prize, and he then announces it is a render which is justified because some people have larger brick collections (or money to spend on BrickLink) than others, which gives them a better chance of winning. Would any of you support Artizan in terms of having remained in this competition to make his point?

Edited by caperberry, 16 April 2012 - 12:00 PM.

Posted Image
I'm running a microscale architecture competition! First prize: a copy of 4000010 LEGO House

#46 CarsonBrick

CarsonBrick

    Posts: 93
    Joined: 20-March 11
    Member: 16725

Posted 16 April 2012 - 03:18 PM

I apoligize for the false accusation. I just though that they appeared to be light bley. And for the dark green plate, I just miscounted it, and it's a 6x10, not a 6x8. Sorry, I'll try not to get into situations like this again  :blush:
Posted Image Posted ImagePosted ImagePosted Image

#47 Sinner

Sinner

  • Mike's Magical Elf


    Posts: 19265
    Joined: 29-April 07
    Member: 1554
    Country: Australia

Posted 16 April 2012 - 03:38 PM

....let's just drop the whole issue please. To me it's been resolved.





Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image

Full details on the Siegfried About Me page!


#48 Rufus

Rufus

  • Schnell! Schnell! Kartoffelkopf!


    Posts: 4902
    Joined: 15-July 09
    Member: 6705
    Country: England

Posted 17 April 2012 - 12:03 AM

This entry is in violation of the rules, and therefore ineligible for the contest.  Please refer to the Official Statement.  

Please use this thread to comment on the MOC itself, but no further discussion regarding eligibility will be tolerated.

Thanks.

#49 Artizan

Artizan

    Posts: 543
    Joined: 11-June 08
    Member: 3274

Posted 10 May 2012 - 06:21 PM

I was not going to reply again in this forum, but knowing that many people voted for me and supported my creation I thought I should share this with the community.
So today I received a mail from the Lego Company , stating that they have removed my project because it is not following guidelines. This is the second injustice done to me after my project was disqualified from the contest.

Let's have a look at what the guidelines say:
-Content that is intended to advertise, campaign, or promote a political/religious viewpoint as well as content intended to put down a political/religious belief held by another person or group of people will be removed.

My project obviously doesn't do such thing. I have never tried to promote any religious belief, but just because the landmark I chose to make has domes and minarets, and is used to be a mosque/church, Lego decided it is not appropriate. I have stated very clearly that it is not used for worshipping anymore, and it is a museum now. TLC itself has produced a set which can be considered a religious structure,  Taj Mahal, so their point is invalid.
I want you to support my case on Cuusoo:
https://getsatisfact...project_removal
Thank you very much for reading.
Posted Image
If you want to see Age of Empires 2 Lego sets be produced, then support!:http://lego.cuusoo.c...deas/view/52276

#50 Ricecracker

Ricecracker

  • In a canoe


    Posts: 4643
    Joined: 25-November 07
    Member: 2221
    Country: Canada

Posted 10 May 2012 - 07:56 PM

Have a look at what was said in the Winchester announcement:

Quote

Understand that we will not produce products that are related to these topics:

...

Religious references including symbols, buildings, or people




Reply to this topic



  


2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users