15 replies to this topic

[Brickdoctor]

You've seen the Nu-class Assault Shuttle and the Venator-class Star Destroyer, what about the rest of the miniature army? I've decided to post it all here, Legostein-style. These are all older MOCs, so expect bad images.

First off, the beloved LAAT/i or Republic Gunship was my starting point:

This has a version 2 coming, but while waiting, see more on MOCpages.

Having done that, I built the LAAT/c, or Republic Dropship:

My personal favorite, you can see more, including action shots, on MOCpages.

Of course, what's a dropship with nothing to drop? The AT-TE is an extremely old MOC that I haven't gotten around to redoing yet:

See more on MOCpages.

I did build a bunch of other mini walkers, which you can see here, but I don't consider them good enough to post here.

Next up, the TX-130 Saber-class Tank, or Republic Fighter Tank:

See more on MOCpages.

Last but certainly not least, the AT-OT completes the 'army':

See more on MOCpages.

BONUS!
All the ground vehicles can be carried into battle by the LAAT/c:



When I get the time, I've got three mini vehicles from the CIS that will be posted next.
Thanks for patiently reading that whole post, C&C welcome!

[prateek]

Great MOCs! I love that all the ground vehicles fit in the LAAT

[Brickdoctor]

 prateek, on 09 July 2010 - 06:34 PM, said:

I love that all the ground vehicles fit in the LAAT

Thanks. It was my main focus; instead of trying to make everything as small as possible, I like to do everything at the 1:200 scale to make them compatible. (other than capital ships, of course)

[brickfoot]

Awesome minis. But you really need to redo your AT-TE.

Edited by brickfoot, 09 July 2010 - 08:33 PM.

[JCC1004]

 brickfoot, on 09 July 2010 - 06:46 PM, said:

Awesome minis. But you really need to redo your AT-AT.

What AT-AT?

Great job on these BrickDoctor! They all look very nice. I do think the TX-130 could use a bit work. It's just personally it doesn't scream that vehicle to me. I had to look at the name first. The cockpit area is the main flaw. The rest seem very detailed and correct. Instantly recognizable. Great job.

Best regards,
JCC

[brickfoot]

 JCC1004, on 09 July 2010 - 07:37 PM, said:

What AT-AT?

Ah sorry AT-TE. I was building an AT-AT at the time I posted so must have accidentally typed that.

[SirWacky]

Very nice job!
These are some of the best minis I've seen!
My favorite would have to be the LAAT!

[Brickdoctor]

 brickfoot, on 09 July 2010 - 06:46 PM, said:

Awesome minis. But you really need to redo your AT-TE.

Yeah, unfortunately, I used up most of the required bricks to begin on my other creations, but I hope to restock in light bley soon.

 JCC1004, on 09 July 2010 - 07:37 PM, said:

I do think the TX-130 could use a bit work. It's just personally it doesn't scream that vehicle to me. I had to look at the name first. The cockpit area is the main flaw.

Agreed. Scale got in the way here.

[KielDaMan]

Nice minis Doc! Yours are different but still as impressive as Legostein's. I see a lot of your so-called 'illegal' connections but they still make the overall design effective. Great job! Do you have an army of these?

[Special K]

These are so cute!!

[Brig. Brick]

incredibly detailed to be of that size

when you go the AT-AT and AT-ST?

[lightningtiger]

Excellent work again 'Brickdoctor' these mini's are AWESOME !
Keep on bricking !

[Darth Yogi]

wow those look great and have so much detail
aseome job

[Brickdoctor]

 KielDaMan, on 10 July 2010 - 01:54 AM, said:

Do you have an army of these?

Sadly, no. I used the 'Scrap and Rebuild' method for all but my very best models. Right now, only the Venator, UCS V-Wing, UCS STAP, and the latest AT-RT are still intact. My parts collection doesn't permit much more.

 Brig. Brick, on 10 July 2010 - 02:43 AM, said:

when you go the AT-AT and AT-ST?

I did the AT-AT on my Endor diorama, but since it was a near-exact copy of Roguebanta's, I didn't post it. The AT-ST was done a loooooooong time ago, and it looked horrible, but I haven't redone it yet.

 JCC1004, on 09 July 2010 - 07:37 PM, said:

I do think the TX-130 could use a bit work. It's just personally it doesn't scream that vehicle to me. I had to look at the name first. The cockpit area is the main flaw.

Looking back, is it because I omitted the turret? I used the original design without the turret because it got in the way of the LAAT/c's pickup mechanism.

[KielDaMan]

 Brickdoctor, on 10 July 2010 - 05:31 PM, said:

Sadly, no. I used the 'Scrap and Rebuild' method for all but my very best models. Right now, only the Venator, UCS V-Wing, UCS STAP, and the latest AT-RT are still intact. My parts collection doesn't permit much more.

Oh that's too bad. I hate to see impressive MOCs discarded and only to be remembered in photos. The good thing is you could always build them all over again if you have the necessary parts. My principle in MOCing has always been to keep each and everyone of my creations, so building other MOCs take considerable amount of time since I have to wait my parts from BL. Well, that's just me.

Edited by KielDaMan, 11 July 2010 - 03:51 AM.

[Brickdoctor]

 KielDaMan, on 11 July 2010 - 03:50 AM, said:

Oh that's too bad. I hate to see impressive MOCs discarded and only to be remembered in photos. The good thing is you could always build them all over again if you have the necessary parts. My principle in MOCing has always been to keep each and everyone of my creations, so building other MOCs take considerable amount of time since I have to wait my parts from BL. Well, that's just me.

I like to keep the very best; everything else I take enough pictures to be able to build again.