Eurobricks Dukes
  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Tamamono

  • Rank
    Needs more time to get it up
  • Birthday 03/08/93

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location
  • Interests
    Let's go to sleep in Paris,
    And wake up in Tokyo.


  • Country
    The States
  • Special Tags 1
  • Special Tags 2
  1. It's completely ridiculous that I'm being purposely ostracized in a situation where we are in no real danger anyway. We can at any point walk off the stage immediately - wake the megabluck up! Don't you realize we're all plastic? Literally made of ABS - no need to work out, you already have plenty! There is no island! We are all LEGO minifigs! This is all a set for a "mafia game" for people who obviously have never experienced what the REAL mafia is like - I'm not even gonna go there. This entire story is a cleverly contrived narrative meant for nothing but the satisfaction of otherworldly beings. There is no such thing as a Shadow except the shadows cast by the photographer when he takes a picture. This whole situation is entirely hyper-real - we are nothing but pawns in some sickos idea of a great game; this is no real world situation but a simulation of suffering and strife meant to appease the minds of feebleminded beings of flesh. Now, if you'll excuse me, *slings scarf over shoulder* I'm out of here.
  2. [quote name='Lady K' timestamp='1452382279' post='2434317'] If you were as townie as you say, then you would want to let everyone know your thoughts before the end of the day as well as cast a vote of your own. I feel that is a helpful thing to do and not a ridiculous standard. We do have results that point to you as scum and we are going to lynch you today. By saying "second scum" is the only one left, are you maybe indicating that there are actually two more after you? Who do you believe are shadows? [/quote] There is clearly no getting through to you. I am not a machine of suspicions, and everyone I suspected died yesterday. If you had read what I said before you'd see that I say CMP/fhomess are last scum, but that's just by process of elimination. I clearly have nothing to gain by pretending to not have suspicions.
  3. [quote name='Lady K' timestamp='1452377523' post='2434248'] Curious that you didn't build a case and vote for who you find most suspicious after your defense. And it seems like you have nothing more to say. A townie would give parting last words to help fellow townies find the shadows and expose them to the light. [/quote] This is your first time running a block and I understand it's difficult and frustrating, but for future reference this is a ridiculous standard - I'm literally drawing a blank at this point, as is everyone else. I'm being voted by several people who admit that they're only doing it because you said to, and have no "case and vote against who they find most suspicious" - yet I believe are town. I would say that actually a scum would be able to do that because they would pull out any random person to accuse - I as a townie don't have that luxury. Especially with a case as flimsy as "well, we probably caught one, not sure." I have made several substantive arguments that you simply have no answer to - if your result points to me being scum, then lynch me, and know that the "second scum" is the only one left. Otherwise, this is a waste of time at a possibly critical moment.
  4. [quote name='Lady K' timestamp='1452280918' post='2433303'] Ok, I am going to vote now based on the results of all my blocks that leads to another indirect scum result. We also believe that there may actually be two scum left. In addition to my block results, Foorth also voted for me day one with no reasons other than he didn't like my reasons for voting Anthony. He then tried to encourage everyone to vote for me, Elijah agreed and added his vote. Foorth was very quiet after Anthony was revealed as scum due to night results from our investigator. Only after I called him out did he post more often, however he hasn't really contributed much in actually helping to find scum. [b]Vote: Foorth Dyke (Tamamono) [/b] And a note of interest, Elijah has been trying to get a lynch on Ewan since the very beginning of Day 1. [/quote] I don't know what this vague incrimination means, but I assure you there is no way that blocking me did anything - I am vanilla. As for voting you, I answered this yesterday - it was Day One and it was because I didn't think the vote was legitimate. I'm not sure what you want me to say past that. If you'll look to the Fourth Day, you'll see that her claim that I'm not helpful is just false - I analyzed literally walls of posts and offered a cogent analysis of who I believed to be scum. I was wrong, unfortunately, but so was everyone else. I could care less what you requested of me because at the end of the day it didn't effect my decision but I can't prove that - let my efforts speak for themselves. I posted because I thought analyzing Cutcobra's posts would be helpful - nothing more. I've been unable to do that today because real life has gotten in the way, and because I'm simply stumped after this. I guess the most likely targets are fhomess and CMP, but that's mostly process of elimination. [quote name='Dragonfire' timestamp='1452286272' post='2433387'] Can you please clarify: by the word "block" / "blocks", are you referring to the town block's evidence or are you referring to your own night action (ie. you blocked Foorth). It would be helpful to know because if you blocked him on the night that only Duke died, that contributes massively to the case against him. [/quote] Exactly - I want to know what charges are being pressed against me. There is good news though - since you say there are probably 2 scum, and if you think I'm one, that means there's only actually one.
  5. I'm traveling right now but will answer asap - sorry for absence; will read up when I am able to tonight
  6. Wow, I'm surprised about these results! I thought TPRU and MT was the team... So much for my reads. Who's left that's a likely suspect? King, fhomess, CMP?
  7. [quote name='Lady K' timestamp='1451838882' post='2427332'] Foorth, why do you want to look for teams? At this point wouldn't the shadows try to distance themselves from each other so one can survive? Also what about the possibility of an SK? That hasn't been brought up as much here as other times in the past, the lack of kills hasn't even been discussed as much at all.....like some are trying to keep that thought in the dark? We may very well have 3 left not just 2. The rules are specific.....all enemy factions. I don't think it would be worded so clearly if it wasn't a possibility. [/quote] I don't see an SK happening with lack of kills. If anything it's a survivor/jester and latter is too audacious, former we don't really have to worry about if there is one since it can't do anything most of the time. Although I agree that "all enemy factions" doesn't bode well. Maybe 3 Shadows and 2 of some other faction? I think looking in teams for Shadows is helpful in Day 1-3 behavior, but yeah they'll try to distance today. There's a lot we can get from early interactions.
  8. [b]Vote: Ewan (mostlytechnic)[/b] [quote name='Tariq j' timestamp='1451808932' post='2427063'] It's funny you say that Foorth, because on Day One you also subtly defended Anthony: So to me this whole post feels like an attempt to shift the focus on to someone else other than yourself... [/quote] I specifically said I had a bad Day One, but you're free to believe anything you like. [quote name='Dragonfire' timestamp='1451823681' post='2427171'] How many scum do we think there are? With seventeen initial players, I can't think there would be any more than four scum, especially since last game was so unbalanced. Two down, so two (probably) left. What if the team is Quincy, Wynn, Duke and Anthony? In that scenario Duke would probably be allowed to claim tracker.... Either way, I think you have a good point: the scum are likely to be in Quincy, Wynn, Woodcock and Ewan. Possibly Gale, Lusk and Dink, but those three are somewhat less likely. [/quote] Excellent point; I think we're looking for two right now, which means we have to look for teams.
  9. [quote name='TinyPiesRUs' timestamp='1451792863' post='2426959'] I don't think I'd realised before that Anthony directly PMed Woodcock and Julia about their votes. Assuming they responded to his accusations via PM, I wonder if Woodcock and Julia could provide evidence of their conversation for us? [/quote] Good idea.
  10. [quote name='jluck' timestamp='1449847686' post='2406319'] Vote for Elijah on day one, It will be wonderfully fun! Because the moment he's lynched, He becomes "Jluck's B**ch", And his Mafia days will be done. [/quote] All this fuckery is pretty asinine, but do we think it's a bus? I think no - that happens with the substantive votes, not with the random Day One votes. I would say def is town. [quote name='jluck' timestamp='1449895461' post='2406891'] If you think I'm the best candidate and you have reasons to vote for me, do it. If you have reasons for your voting for doctor Wynn, share them. I just want you to contribute to the conversation in a useful manner. Day 1 is hard enough to get right without mindless voting. [/quote] [quote name='Tariq j' timestamp='1449916026' post='2407020'] Honestly, Jluck hasn't actually pinged me that much, he posts haven't been normal for sure but I see it as his [s]role playing[/s] personality than scummy posts. But what I do find suspicious is you quickly jumping on the easiest bandwagon. So for that reason: [b]Vote: Delwyn Couch (Ranger of the Forest)[/b] [/quote] This is somewhat interesting, although may not be worth following up on; jluck subtly asks for justification on the Tariq J vote, and Tariq J quasi-defending him... opinions? I also did not have the greatest Day One, as we discussed yesterday, so it may not mean much, but this type of subtlety is a bit more scum-like. [quote name='jluck' timestamp='1450015708' post='2408163'] So are you saying you have a town lean on perce? I want to get your stance nailed down for future reference, either good or bad. [/quote] This was directed at Tariq, however, and does not necessarily feel like a scum interaction. What do you all think? [quote name='jluck' timestamp='1450044281' post='2408612'] I've already voted for my strongest read and don't want to change my vote unless a split is imminent. I will monitor the progression for that purpose. How are we on time? Also, I'm mildly concerned with your pm quote, is that allowed? [/quote] Would he bring up a possible rules infraction for one of his own (Dragonfire, in this instance)? I think not... [quote name='jluck' timestamp='1450229559' post='2410725'] I can speak for myself on this. I PMed 8 people last night the following message: [/quote] How many of those on this list are scum? He pointed out CMP and Bob as scummy; I remember because I received the message too. I feel like there might be a scum in there. Since I also suspect MT, who CMP has made a rather eloquent case for, I'm leaning Bob on the one here, if there is one [quote] I was in the middle of constructing a post with this info when the day ended. I wanted to get this info out just in case I didn't survive the night because I genuinely believed it was relevant. Of course the no night kill thing coulda helped had I read it :shy: I sent this PM to 8 people, including the accused, to keep everything fair since the post was meant for the message board. I mostly chose people who'd posted in the last few pages because they were easy to click on. Those receiving the message were: Snowman Def Bob Cmp Lady k Dragonfire Tam-o Trpu [/quote] We know snowman is dead and Lady K is town, so the remaining recipients are: TPRU me Dragonfire CMP Bob def I'm town (but you don't have to believe that - I don't mind), and I think DF and def are town as mentioned earlier, which leaves CMP/Bob/TPRU as the possible scum in this circle if there are any. Again, CMP is less likely since MT is very likely, making it between Bob and TPRU, both of whom I think are scummy-ish anyway. So out of Bob, MT, TPRU, and Zempk I think we have our scum - I would bet on two out of the first three. Now the issue arises, however, of bad moves, like Cutcobra's. All of the former three are smart, well-seasoned players. Would they let Cutcobra make such a horrible claim? And one that's so easily verifiable at that! Perhaps he went rogue and did it himself? Things to think about... Tariq J is a possibility too - forgot him in final analysis. Sorry! [quote name='Tariq j' timestamp='1450216900' post='2410521'] Did we though? I still can't understand why everyone decided to change their votes to him. [/quote] [quote name='Bob' timestamp='1450218055' post='2410530'] Having a lynch on Day One is always important, I'm afraid! Day One lynches reveal a lot of wonderful information, for instance, people seem to think I'm suspect because I wasn't entirely convinced that Perce was all that scummy. [/quote] [quote name='Tariq j' timestamp='1450218373' post='2410535'] Fair point . I suppose I was just wondering why everyone went for him. [/quote] Interaction worth looking at. This doesn't seem like a scum interaction - of course it could be, but I would venture that Tariq and Bob are not a team. [quote name='Bob' timestamp='1450295356' post='2411389'] Oh yes, because all early Day One votes are completely airtight cases that are founded upon fantastic evidence. Why haven't you called out any other early Day One votes? Anthony voted for Elijah just for laughs. You don't find that suspicious? Are you just calling out my votes because I'm the one who went after you? Did I perhaps strike a nerve? Excellent! [/quote] This is a point in Bob's favor, mentioning jluck's scumminess before the investigation result, although it was less of an accusation and more of a sideline - a way to get the attention off of himself. [quote name='Tariq j' timestamp='1451411200' post='2422221'] This also seems suspicious, in my mind Ray asked a simple question regarding the logic behind Foorth's "ping" and for that he got voted for, not understanding the logic here. It also surprises me how Duke seems to subtly defend Foorth here by implying his logic is correct. [/quote] Here's Tariq implying that Bob is scum. Again, probably not a team. Bob and TPRU had a long interaction in Days 2-3 which I would think is uncharacteristic for scum as well - I can quote it if desired.
  11. [quote name='TinyPiesRUs' timestamp='1451775419' post='2426723'] It's odd that Duke decided to claim tracker. Normally I would assume that this means the scum have a tracker, but the fact his result was wrong seems to suggest he inexplicably made up the whole thing. We know Anthony claimed vanilla, I wonder if any other scum would take as big a risk as Duke and claim a PR. [/quote] Excellent point - whenever I play scum I make sure it's pretty even for our claims unless we're in a tight space. I would say there's probably one more scum among the more incredible claims - maybe something like bomb?? I remember using that one. Let me pull up some other posts from more of the deceased...
  12. Well, I guess all's well that ends well; it's a shame there was no lynch yesterday, but at least we got Duke at night. I wonder what the Shadows were up to last night? This also suggests they have no protector since Lady K announced his death sentence in the thread yesterday... and that they don't know who the vigilante is. [quote name='Cutcobra' timestamp='1449954646' post='2407479'] So, as far as I can see, the first few votes were based on nothing so I won't be looking into them that much. The fact that Perce Triggs just voted Doctor Wynn out of the blue seems to seem like a typical newbie mistake, nothing special. But the way that Ray Christianen responded to Perce's random vote makes me curious: You aren't adding anything to discussion. It just seems like fluff to make it seem like you are actually part of the discussion. And Delwyn already said what I was going to say about Quincy and if it comes to it, I will vote for her so that we can have a majority as I do find her scummy, but not as scummy as I find Ray here. [b]Vote: Ray Chistiansen (Dragonfire)[/b] [/quote] Duke seemed awfully ready to jump on Ray right from the start. Could be a bus of course, but at this point I don't see a scum trying to immediately start something on another scum. [quote name='Cutcobra' timestamp='1449960143' post='2407580'] Sorry. I was still writing my post when you posted that last message and it didn't feel like fluff to me this time. [b]Unvote: Ray Christiansen[/b] I would vote for Quincy now but I don't want to jump to conclusions since my only reasoning is fluff and I thought that Ray was scummy for posting fluff in the beginning (I was clearly wrong). [/quote] But then he unvotes right after with a BS excuse about cross-posting, which could suggest otherwise... [quote name='Cutcobra' timestamp='1450030230' post='2408347'] I haven't played too many games so I don't know what the default "too much" is considered. I did, actually. Just like you are thinking that I am scum for "posting fluff" I also thought that Ray was scum for posting fluff until I was proven wrong (He seems like he is contributing. To me, at least) I didn't want to vote for Quincy since I don't want to jump right in to something from a mere suggestion of scumminess. I realize I need little more than just fluff as a reason to vote for someone. Up until now, though, he hasn't contributed to anything. Only voted for Perce, who seemed like he (Perce) was getting a bandwagon of votes behind him. So: [b]Vote: Quincy Easton (KingoftheZempk)[/b] I also have you on my radar, since your sudden focus on me seems like a desperate measure to get the attention away from you, and the already added up evidence against you. But you don't really strike me as scum since you are contributing a lot to the discussion. [/quote] He doesn't want to vote for Quincy so soon, but does it anyway... Quincy at this point probably looks like an easy lynch target for him, or a safe vote with a quieter member of the town at the very least. [quote name='Cutcobra' timestamp='1450474525' post='2413423'] The accusations against def (at least I think they are) are practically pointless. In my mind, scum plan every single detail of their post to make sure he/she doesn't seem scummy or doesn't and def seems to experience to let something like "no chance that I am godfather" thing slip up. Then, there is mostlytechnic, He was 'pointing out' that there was a possibility that def was a godfather and it wasn't confirmed that he was scum. Then, as soon as Anthony is confirmed scum: Then he just seems to continue discussing with RangeroftheForest. [/quote] Seems to be buddying def, for better or for worse. Noob scum like to get close to him in these games, but we can't be sure; would he outright defend him if he was his scum buddy? He talks about mostlytechnic as well, but I honestly can't tell what he thinks of him from this post. This could be a scumtell for MT - I always talk about my teammates but remain very ambivalent on them. [quote] Speaking of Quincy (Yes, I am starting every observation with "Speaking of". Sue me), all you did that is of notice was to defend yourself from accusations until you could "hug it out", demand an update on claims and just seem to try and sneakily instill suspicion about Ewan: And you also just continued adding what was already said about mediumsnowman. [/quote] Still talking about Quincy, and this time he's more ambivalent, as with MT... but taken in the context of what he said on Day One, I feel this statement to be a bit different from the previous one. [quote] Speaking of two mafia teams (Yes I know I didn't mention them but still): My only reason to believe that there is only one mafia team is that Danny and Jack clearly stated that it doesn't matter if we did Mafia School or not. Wouldn't it be too complicated for a newbie who only knew the basics? I know this is weak reasoning so don't count me on this. I'd vote for any of the above but honestly there is no point so I'll continue my discussion tomorrow. [/quote] But here he says the above people (MT and King of the Zempk among some dead people) warrant a vote. With a list that big, I wouldn't be surprised if one scum is in there, and since he was after Zempk from day one, I wouldn't be surprised at all if it was mostly technic.
  13. [quote name='Lady K' timestamp='1451401602' post='2422084'] It is very quiet in here......just to get some conversation going I would like to point out that there are many who seem to have disappeared. We need to sing together to keep the shadows at bay! We have too many quiet performers to give a proper concert. Foorth, Duke, Lusk, and Ewan have all been way too quiet, even in private I have not heard much from them. I have open communication with everyone (from asking for claims) and these four have been extremely silent. [/quote] Not at all. I may not be able to participate all day, but when I'm here I participate and offer insights when I have them. I don't have much to say to you in private apart from night action stuff which we have already discussed. [quote] Foorth voted for me day one for voting for Anthony and tried to get a bandwagon forming against me and even didn't not come back to change his vote after my reveal as Town Blocker. [/quote] I didn't think your Anthony vote smelled right and I thought you were scum. I don't remember that day very well, but I remember not knowing you were the blocker until it was the night phase; either I logged on and missed it (possible) or I didn't come on in time to change (most probable). [quote name='KingoftheZempk' timestamp='1451403966' post='2422118'] Foorth is a good start. So, Foorth, why did you not change your vote after we found out who our Town Blocker was? Were you busy? Or were you hoping to turn that around and cause suspicion amongst us? [/quote] Again - don't remember, but I know I didn't know she was the blocker until night phase, at which point I conceded I was wrong to her in private - she will confirm. [quote name='Tariq j' timestamp='1451411200' post='2422221'] This was Footh's vote for Molly. What pings me about this is that he votes for Molly because she voted for Anthony who we now know is scum... This also seems suspicious, in my mind Ray asked a simple question regarding the logic behind Foorth's "ping" and for that he got voted for, not understanding the logic here. It also surprises me how Duke seems to subtly defend Foorth here by implying his logic is correct. [/quote] First point is legit - if I were scum my thinking an Anthony vote is illegit would be smart; I have no answer to this except for the fact that (and I think others will agree here) my vote for Molly was more on HER behavior rather than her target of a vote, even if that still played a factor; i.e. it was less "don't vote for him, he's town" and more "don't care about him, but I don't like you." But again, as town, I don't plan out my moves strategically, so I have no master plan or explanation. I'm leaning scum on Woodcock as well (since he's who you're referring to, not Duke, right?), so I think you're on to something with point #2; scum vets try to cozy up to town vets oftentimes. [quote name='Dragonfire' timestamp='1451428146' post='2422496'] To be honest, Foorth hasn't posted much and so I'm kind of in the middle on him. I don't have much of a read on him. I mentioned the Delwyn thing as a bit of a FYI just so everyone knew who Delwyn was suspicious of. And as for my reply to Quincy, I was calling out Quincy for his poor accusation, not so much defending Foorth in particular. Had it been any other player, I would have done the same: it was the accusation that I had a problem with. I know what it's like to be accused of something due to not being online at a particular moment (the end of the day in particular). I don't know which timezone Foorth lives in, but I think it's stupid to accuse [i]anyone [/i]due to them being absent. If they're online but don't comment, that's a different matter entirely. Just my take on things. [/quote] Thank you. I probably do look pretty bad for not unvoting after she claimed - that's true, and I understand the accusations against me! I'm glad you caught it. All the same, though, this is absolutely right - I'm town and would have no reason to not unvote. When there's 1 vote on the town blocker and no risk of a lynch of her and she's claimed, do you think I'd maintain course as scum?
  14. [quote name='JackJonespaw' timestamp='1451240206' post='2420340'] There wasn't any killing on Night 1. That was my rule. [/quote] I had forgotten in the holiday rush. What kind of fourth wall breaker am I? The point remains, though: why Ranger of the Forest?
  15. Good to see that the cop is real. [quote name='Bob' timestamp='1451234232' post='2420251'] Splendid! It's marvelous that our investigator was right about Anthony. It would seem the town block is coalescing perfectly! Anthony's silence and actions at the end of the day pretty much confirmed it, of course, but it's good to have the official results! I'll admit that I'm surprised about Mike. He was on my scum list, I must say. The bizarre personal messages he exchanged with Anthony towards the end of Day Two really made me suspicious, but I suppose he was telling the truth. [/quote] I actually thought those messages looked pretty legitimate. Was he a vig kill or a scum kill I wonder? And why Ranger of the Forest? And what happened Night 1? The vig understandably would stay home, but what of the scum? There is a lot we can do with the kills today I think.