Siegfried

EB Technic Meister: Are you one?

54 posts in this topic

For the upcoming contest I want the winner to be selected from a function driven perspective, not aesthetics alone, so I will be stacking the deck in terms of votes. To do this (fairly) I need 5+ people to weed out the under-deserving entries. What am I looking for? People who appreciate Technic. People who see a model and won't say; "It looks too Technicy". :hmpf: Think you're qualified? Post here why then... :grin: Just be sure that you have the time to help... I'm hoping to be able to pick more than I need, but I'll want at least 5. Why? Well I'm happy for people to be able to enter the contest and be on the Meister panel, but to avoid any claims of bias I'll need to have their vote diluted enough.

Rewards? Not too many in the short term. I'll be creating a secret forum for the Meister to discuss Meistery things, and you'll probably all get a tag, but for those interested it could be a gateway to other things.... :wink:

(There's no hurry; I don't need to have these selected for at least a month.)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As has been pointed out by others, I'm not really a "MOCcer" but I do appreciate the great Lego Technic creations done by others. Since my idea for the upcoming contest has not been accepted, I volunteer to help "weed out the under-deserving entries". :look:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As has been pointed out by others, I'm not really a "MOCcer" but I do appreciate the great Lego Technic creations done by others. Since my idea for the upcoming contest has not been accepted, I volunteer to help "weed out the under-deserving entries". :look:

There's no need to be a MOCer (I'll update the post to clarify this), and I recognize your credentials. :laugh:

Consider yourself in. :sweet:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you think I can be helpful, I also offer to make this happen and weed out some entries. :laugh:

Most certainly I won't participate in the contest, so more talented builders can participate instead of being tied to such tasks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think I'm qualified to be among these five people.

With all the Technic review I've written, now I can pretty easily "read" a model in order to find his strengths and weaknesses, both from technical and esthetical aspects. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you think I can be helpful, I also offer to make this happen and weed out some entries. :laugh:

Most certainly I won't participate in the contest, so more talented builders can participate instead of being tied to such tasks.

I think I'm qualified to be among these five people.

With all the Technic review I've written, now I can pretty easily "read" a model in order to find his strengths and weaknesses, both from technical and esthetical aspects. :)

In, and in. :sweet:

BTW, I can't see any harm in allowing people who enter to be part of the panel. That's why I want at least 5, but preferably about 10. I'll clarify this as well. :laugh:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would be happy to help as well,so you can put my name down as well.:sweet:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It will be a great honor for me Siegfried, if you consider, that you need an oppinion from impartial person. I'm also not a MOC'er, but I love to see a good technically sophisticated Technic creation. I'm a mechanical technician, so technical point of view is not unknown to me. I'll be glad, if you consider to invite me to this group of people.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would love to join the panel of judges Siegfried! I love technical creations and i am not scared by a whole lot of gears :wink: . Would i be able to participate in the contest and still judge?

tim

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's either joining the jury or the participants for me.

And eventhough I do MOC every now and then; I would better be of better use as an impartial judge.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's either joining the jury or the participants for me.

I would agree with that in order to avoid a conflict of interests.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe i can be helpfull, I mostly MOC only technic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Damb i'de like to do that. It's just a lack of time thing. For the next few months at least I won't even have the time to make MOCs myself. Oh well :cry_sad:

Edited by allanp

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting. Apparently it's going to be all-judges, no-contestants kind of challenge :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting. Apparently it's going to be all-judges, no-contestants kind of challenge :)

My thoughts exactly. :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

LOL...well, I'd rather be a contestant than a judge, but from what I understand, judges can be contestants. Or, maybe I'm wrong?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would agree with that in order to avoid a conflict of interests.

I can't see any issue with a person being on the panel. The rough plan for the voting is this;

1. People make MOCs.

2. The voting panel vote each pick, in no order, what half they think should be in.

3. I tally up the votes and I then have my weeded out list of the best entires.

4. EB selects the winner.

Providing we have enough entries and enough Meisters I think it'll still be fair. I've actually been wanting to experiment with this style of voting for a while... :laugh:

Damb i'de like to do that. It's just a lack of time thing. For the next few months at least I won't even have the time to make MOCs myself. Oh well :cry_sad:

It won't take that much time. When the time comes I'll ask for a list of at least 5 (but preferably 50% of the total entries) that you think should be included. I'll give about a week for everyone to decide, and I'll allow conversation and vote changing. So it'll take 5 minutes if you are pressed for time, but a week if you want...! :tongue:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well i would love to participate to then(as long as i can still enter)!

tim

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, it is or participant or "meister"?

If so, I want to be both :tongue:

No, serious, I think I want to participate in the contest rather than be a jury, but if there are really not enough "meisters", I always want to help :classic:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would like to participate too, both as a contestant and as a jury, my credentials... technic builder since childhood, creator of a LEGO Technic Blog with 1 year old and moderator of Technic forum of Hispalug. :hmpf_bad:

Edited by parda

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This thread is pretty full, so maybe I'm too late to join the party. In any rate, I have a certain amount of expertise in these matters and would certainly enjoy the opportunity to be on the panel if it is not too full already. I think the title under my avatar at left uniquely qualifies me to give the boot to unacceptable entries.

Edited by Blakbird

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This thread is pretty full, so maybe I'm too late to join the party. In any rate, I have a certain amount of expertise in these matters and would certainly enjoy the opportunity to be on the panel if it is not too full already. I think the title under my avatar at left uniquely qualifies me to give the boot to unacceptable entries.

you're probably more qualified than any of us :classic:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.