Lowa

Full Train Layout Control with Tablet

16 posts in this topic

We have been working on expanding our train automation system.  The video below provides a glimpse of the (near) future.  In this video we control everything from a tablet: switches, traffic lights, train head lights and the train itself...

The layout automation system is connected to a PC that runs nControl, the tablet interfaces with the PC using a remote desktop app like TeamViewer.  The train uses a prototype of our WiFi based train controller.  The train communicates with nControl using nControl's internal MQTT server.  The track switch motors and controllers are available; the traffic lights should become available the first weeks of April.  The train controller is in development: the goal is to be able to control the direction, speed, head lights, check the battery power, and use a position sensor so nControl can track the position of the train on the layout.

Let us know what you think!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You've really got my attention with this. If you can manage to make the entire system run from a tablet only, then we'll talk. I'd love to be able to take this on the road for shows. Being able to control everything from one tablet is great and would make life so much easier. If you add in double crossovers and remote control capabilities for them... the sky's the limit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done!!! Looks awesome. Getting closer and closer to what I want/need for my layout.

Keep up the great work!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, Feuer Zug said:

You've really got my attention with this. If you can manage to make the entire system run from a tablet only, then we'll talk. I'd love to be able to take this on the road for shows. Being able to control everything from one tablet is great and would make life so much easier. If you add in double crossovers and remote control capabilities for them... the sky's the limit.

Take a Lenovo Yoga, then. Or any other Windows-based Tablet-PC :classic:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Lowa said:

"The train controller is in development: the goal is to be able to control the direction, speed, head lights, check the battery power, and use a position sensor so nControl can track the position of the train on the layout..."

So you mean like having PTC for Lego trains!? Oh. My. Now that is really freakin' COOL!!! Even though I like steamers where everything is manual or mechanical being able to run all your trains on PTC would be awesome!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Feuer Zug said:

You've really got my attention with this. If you can manage to make the entire system run from a tablet only, then we'll talk. I'd love to be able to take this on the road for shows. Being able to control everything from one tablet is great and would make life so much easier. If you add in double crossovers and remote control capabilities for them... the sky's the limit.

We're working on a Raspberry Pi based layout controller that can run nControl and manage the system; and then use a tablet/phone to interface with that controller.  That will allow you to take the traditional computer out of the loop.  What do you think?

About the double crossovers, we're working on a 'modular switch system' that will allow you to make a variety of different switches with a limited number of track pieces; double crossovers being one of them.  The main difference with the 7996 will be that ours has 4 fully independent switches, so you can run the trains parallel at the same time...  We're making good progress and if all goes well we'll I should be able show the first 'final' prototypes beginning next week.

9 hours ago, Younge said:

Well done!!! Looks awesome. Getting closer and closer to what I want/need for my layout.

Keep up the great work!!!

Thanks!  What is still missing for you ?

9 hours ago, Capparezza said:

Take a Lenovo Yoga, then. Or any other Windows-based Tablet-PC :classic:

Indeed, we have customers that are using our track switch motors like that!

2 hours ago, ALCO said:

So you mean like having PTC for Lego trains!? Oh. My. Now that is really freakin' COOL!!! Even though I like steamers where everything is manual or mechanical being able to run all your trains on PTC would be awesome!

Yes, that's what we're working on!  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, zephyr1934 said:

That is awesome.

Thank you!  To everyone who's following what we're doing: this is just the beginning; we want to automate every aspect of LEGO train layouts.  For example, we just finalized a design for a PF track compatible decoupler: it allows you to remotely decouple railcars of LEGO trains; it's a PF version of 7862 for the old 12V system. 

If you like what we're doing help us spread the word by sharing posts...  or place and order and share your experience :wink:

4dbrix-lego-train-decoupler-open.jpg4dbrix-lego-train-decoupler-closed.jpg

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Now this is interesting. I really enjoy shunting on my OO scale railway, and I have experimented with building locomotives with retracting magnets and so on, but this looks a much easier way of building a decent, working shunting yard without raising up the tracks. Have you any idea how much these would cost? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, ColletArrow said:

Now this is interesting. I really enjoy shunting on my OO scale railway, and I have experimented with building locomotives with retracting magnets and so on, but this looks a much easier way of building a decent, working shunting yard without raising up the tracks. Have you any idea how much these would cost? 

I'm glad you like it!

I still need to do the final price calculation but the decoupler track you see on the pictures would be around $10-$12.  You also need a servo motor to actuate it, the motor will be the same price as our track switch motors: $15.  To control the motor you need one slot of a quad switch controller ($39.95); that's the same controller as for our track switches, so you can use the three remaining slots of the controller to motorize track switches... or connect additional decouplers.  As an alternative to the controller you can also use your own Arduino board.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, Lowa said:

We're working on a Raspberry Pi based layout controller that can run nControl and manage the system; and then use a tablet/phone to interface with that controller.  That will allow you to take the traditional computer out of the loop.  What do you think?

About the double crossovers, we're working on a 'modular switch system' that will allow you to make a variety of different switches with a limited number of track pieces; double crossovers being one of them.  The main difference with the 7996 will be that ours has 4 fully independent switches, so you can run the trains parallel at the same time...  We're making good progress and if all goes well we'll I should be able show the first 'final' prototypes beginning next week.

 

Yes, that will work perfectly. Once you get some switches out on the market, then I'll make an order. That's the big thing I'm holding out for. After that, I'd be willing to try some of the electronics. Oh, and the decoupler.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 hours ago, Lowa said:

Thanks!  What is still missing for you ?

In one of your videos I seem to remember seeing some sensors being used. Are they still on the cards?

Where I want to go with my layout you sort of alluded to in the following post:

13 hours ago, Lowa said:

Thank you!  To everyone who's following what we're doing: this is just the beginning; we want to automate every aspect of LEGO train layouts.  For example, we just finalized a design for a PF track compatible decoupler: it allows you to remotely decouple railcars of LEGO trains; it's a PF version of 7862 for the old 12V system. 

If you like what we're doing help us spread the word by sharing posts...  or place and order and share your experience :wink:

12 volt-era equivalent parts is what I have been hoping/wishing for. I have started getting all the bits and pieces together to build up a 12-volt layout, but I soon found the cost of some of the parts to be prohibitive - and general life expenses getting in the way of a Lego train project (that's the wife talking!). There's also the risk of parts becoming more and more scarce and therefore even more expensive in the future.

Your system has the potential of being better than the 12-volt system as we won't be as locked down as that system was by the fact that we can use controllers like Arduino. Also, nothing is stopping you from inventing various add-ons down the track (such as proximity sensors). We also get the added benefit of mobility with a tablet device (if wanted).

De-couplers, switches, lights, motor controls - this is all going in a fantastic direction, and one appreciated by those of us that aren't as technically-minded as some of the other people on this forum.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/9/2017 at 0:38 PM, Lowa said:

For example, we just finalized a design for a PF track compatible decoupler: it allows you to remotely decouple railcars of LEGO trains; it's a PF version of 7862 for the old 12V system.

Is that unit only 7 studs long? If so, I'd suggest lengthening it to be 8 studs or 1/2 half of a standard track length. Also, you should test the side clearance to make sure that a steam driver with at least a full technic beam can clear (there are some steam designs like the EN that actually require two technic beams beyond the wheel). Another thing to keep in mind is that many builders do 8 wide pilots. Sure, tricky or impossible to make something work for all possible builds that folks make, but possibly contemplate a second version if demand arises (no sense in doing so until someone actually asks for it though... and I am NOT asking with this note, just giving a few observations).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

On 3/10/2017 at 1:52 AM, Younge said:

In one of your videos I seem to remember seeing some sensors being used. Are they still on the cards?

Absolutely!  We're waiting for the cables; we had to custom order them.  They are currently being manufactured by a supplier, once we have them we can start making the sensors and lights.

On 3/10/2017 at 1:52 AM, Younge said:

Your system has the potential of being better than the 12-volt system as we won't be as locked down as that system was by the fact that we can use controllers like Arduino. Also, nothing is stopping you from inventing various add-ons down the track (such as proximity sensors). We also get the added benefit of mobility with a tablet device (if wanted).

De-couplers, switches, lights, motor controls - this is all going in a fantastic direction, and one appreciated by those of us that aren't as technically-minded as some of the other people on this forum.

The goal is indeed to have a system that is on one hand easy to set-up and does not require an in depth knowledge of electronics or programming; but on the other hand is open to be used by with a DIY control system.  We try to make it easy to use for beginners but fully customizable for advanced users.  This is the beginning, if it takes off there's indeed nothing that stops us from making a whole range a gadgets to automate the layouts including proximity sensors, LCD displays, etc. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/11/2017 at 9:56 AM, zephyr1934 said:

Is that unit only 7 studs long? If so, I'd suggest lengthening it to be 8 studs or 1/2 half of a standard track length. Also, you should test the side clearance to make sure that a steam driver with at least a full technic beam can clear (there are some steam designs like the EN that actually require two technic beams beyond the wheel). Another thing to keep in mind is that many builders do 8 wide pilots. Sure, tricky or impossible to make something work for all possible builds that folks make, but possibly contemplate a second version if demand arises (no sense in doing so until someone actually asks for it though... and I am NOT asking with this note, just giving a few observations).

The decoupler is 8 studs long, so it easy to integrate it into a layout; the picture might be deceptive because the part that blocks the wheels is in the middle of two studs.  

The clearance is about 3mm on both sides.  It's not straightforward to increase that because of the range of the servo motor.  With this design only 6 stud wide objects will pass; 8 stud wide objects will only pass unless they are at least 2 plates (6.4mm) above the top of the track.  The decoupler now extends 6 studs out of the track, the motor extends it with another 2 studs.  With the current design you can fit the decoupler into a set of parallel tracks that are 8 studs apart.  If the decoupler needs a larger clearance this would no longer be possible.  A decoupler with a wider clearance is most likely possible, but as you pointed out every design will have limitations and nothing will work very every possible build.  But if there is a clear demand, we can certainly look into that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Really cool idea! Just wondering if you can do something that would rise up between the rails so the inexperienced eye could not tell a decoupler even exists. Especially if the track were ballasted. I cannot remember where I saw it but someone had made something that was just a 2x4 piece of ballast and sleeper that would come up and hold the bogie in place. Just a thought....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.