x105Black Posted September 11, 2016 Yes this new 60 day filter will keep the half-hearted troll kiddie projects from lasting that long. Sure they will be archived, but they won't waste space when searching for good projects. Although this thread is about to get a lot more quite I am willing to bet! As long as the crap projects continue to make it past their moderators based on some nebulous and negligible standard of quality, this thread will be active enough. The projects won't last as long, but we still have 60 days to notice them and post them here. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Artanis I Posted September 11, 2016 And when your project expires you can re-submit it anyway! Perpetually below 100 supporters! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
anothergol Posted September 11, 2016 Crap projects won't be archived, but who does searches in the archive anyway? Newcomers do search a little, but afterwards they just check out what's new from time to time. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PicnicBasketSam Posted September 11, 2016 This is just ghastly.... presentation, description, photos, actual build, all of them are awful: https://ideas.lego.com/projects/152615 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Boxerlego Posted September 12, 2016 (edited) This Project here (https://ideas.lego.com/projects/147876) is the best example of the Best and Worst of LEGO Ideas has to offer. First off Its terrible becasue Is bigoted against the Men of NASA. What the LEGO Project should be is "The People Of NASA". In fact LEGO should just make Wernher Von Braun Mini Figure along With a Lego Saturn V(5) model and a Lego Moon model and it should have a Dedicated Plaque that Reads "One Man's Vision Introduced the rest of Humanity to the Moon. He was the Sole Key for success and with out Wernher Von Braun there would be no NASA and there would be no Moon Landing." All in all I'm 100% Sure that all these Women that have played critical roles in the U.S. space program owe their contributions to the one Man that introduced us to the Moon. In fact If you think about it Wernher Von Braun is the Key that open the door to the moon break that key will the door be open again. See all you got to do is Imagine a world where Wernher Von Braun was still remembered and his achievement's were still valued and then you start to get the picture why he is forgotten in history and why the Divers People of NASA just cant reach his level of expertise... But Dont worry NASA Ahmed the phony clock boy will save you . Edited September 12, 2016 by Boxerlego Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lyichir Posted September 12, 2016 This Project here (https://ideas.lego.com/projects/147876) is the best example of the Best and Worst of LEGO Ideas has to offer. First off Its terrible becasue Is bigoted against the Men of NASA. What the LEGO Project should be is "The People Of NASA". In fact LEGO should just make Wernher Von Braun Mini Figure along With a Lego Saturn V(5) model and a Lego Moon model and it should have a Dedicated Plaque that Reads "One Man's Vision Introduced the rest of Humanity to the Moon. He was the the Sole Key for success and with out Wernher Von Braun there would be no NASA and there would be no Moon Landing." All in all I'm 100% Sure that all these Women that have played critical roles in the U.S. space program owe their contributions to the one Man that introduced us to the Moon. That is stupid and ridiculous. The "Women of Nasa" project is designed to introduce people who are only familiar with the men in the history books (to a few of the many women who played critical roles in the history of space exploration. There's nothing "bigoted" about focusing a design on a certain demographic, especially when that demographic is often overlooked or sidelined in discussion of the history of space exploration. And insisting that Wernher Von Braun be included just because he paved the way for what came later is ridiculous—obviously a great many people's discoveries paved the way for modern astronauts, from Galileo to Newton to Einstein, but that's hardly reason to take a project focused specifically on major female figures in NASA's history and shift the focus of the project to a single man. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Boxerlego Posted September 12, 2016 That is stupid and ridiculous. The "Women of Nasa" project is designed to introduce people who are only familiar with the men in the history books (to a few of the many women who played critical roles in the history of space exploration. There's nothing "bigoted" about focusing a design on a certain demographic, especially when that demographic is often overlooked or sidelined in discussion of the history of space exploration. And insisting that Wernher Von Braun be included just because he paved the way for what came later is ridiculous—obviously a great many people's discoveries paved the way for modern astronauts, from Galileo to Newton to Einstein, but that's hardly reason to take a project focused specifically on major female figures in NASA's history and shift the focus of the project to a single man. Everything I said is Correct, But this is about Equality and what better way to Promote the "People of NASA" then a War Torn Refuge Migrant Rocket Scientist Like Wernher Von Braun. But I get it the shoe does not fit on the other foot for you. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pittpenguin123 Posted September 12, 2016 This is a set every body needs https://ideas.lego.com/projects/153623 this cant be under the piece limit can it? its a good build but not right for ideas https://ideas.lego.com/projects/153281 This is such a meta idea project https://ideas.lego.com/projects/152919 Do i need to say anything https://ideas.lego.com/projects/152486 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Blondie-Wan Posted September 12, 2016 (edited) Everything I said is Correct, But this is about Equality and what better way to Promote the "People of NASA" then a War Torn Refuge Migrant Rocket Scientist Like Wernher Von Braun. But I get it the shoe does not fit on the other foot for you. They've already approved an Apollo 11 Saturn V project; that will most likely give us minifigures of certain men of NASA before this project gives us anyone. Moreover, the point of this project isn't so much about excluding men; it's just about including women, who make up just as much of the population as men (actually slightly more, in fact), yet who are vastly underrepresented in LEGO sets compared to men. In fact, if we narrow it down from all minifigures ever (which of course includes fantasy beings, robots, aliens, etc.) and focus on just minifigures of real-life people, there are still literally dozens of minifigures of real-world, historical men, but only one of a woman. How would adding five more real-world women to that constitute some sort of unfair treatment of men, who'd still outnumber women in minifigures produced of real people by something like five or six or more to one? Edited September 12, 2016 by Blondie-Wan Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Robert8 Posted September 12, 2016 This is such a meta idea project https://ideas.lego.com/projects/152919 HAHAHAHAH Supported! Do i need to say anything https://ideas.lego.com/projects/152486 For those wondering asking about the new 60 days milestone. This is why. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Brickenberg Posted September 13, 2016 What can you say about this project? Modular walking street https://ideas.lego.com/projects/152944 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Robert8 Posted September 13, 2016 What can you say about this project? Modular walking street https://ideas.lego.com/projects/152944 Looks nice. And it's a good idea. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
BrickJagger Posted September 14, 2016 What can you say about this project? Modular walking street https://ideas.lego.com/projects/152944 Why would you put that in this thread? It looks great Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
PicnicBasketSam Posted September 14, 2016 Now, I think this movie is phenomenal, but this set certainly isn't: https://ideas.lego.com/projects/153128 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jimmynick Posted September 19, 2016 That is stupid and ridiculous. The "Women of Nasa" project is designed to introduce people who are only familiar with the men in the history books (to a few of the many women who played critical roles in the history of space exploration. There's nothing "bigoted" about focusing a design on a certain demographic, especially when that demographic is often overlooked or sidelined in discussion of the history of space exploration. And insisting that Wernher Von Braun be included just because he paved the way for what came later is ridiculous—obviously a great many people's discoveries paved the way for modern astronauts, from Galileo to Newton to Einstein, but that's hardly reason to take a project focused specifically on major female figures in NASA's history and shift the focus of the project to a single man. Not to mention that if TLG don't like making fictional Nazis, there's no way they'd make a real Nazi. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pittpenguin123 Posted September 24, 2016 This is amazing! Â Who wouldnt want to have this in their modular town! Â https://ideas.lego.com/projects/154372 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
x105Black Posted September 24, 2016 41 minutes ago, pittpenguin123 said: This is amazing! Â Who wouldnt want to have this in their modular town! Â https://ideas.lego.com/projects/154372 It's actually a pretty cool build with lots of little details, but I don't want it and don't think it should be produced. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
jimmynick Posted September 26, 2016 It's a pretty cool MOC I saw in my flickr feed this morning - it's pretty well presented but not my cup of tea. Just because you don't like a project doesn't mean it's bad. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
fred67 Posted September 26, 2016 Ladies and gentlemen; proof positive you could literally slap a brick on a plate and have it accepted by ideas: https://ideas.lego.com/projects/154740 Â Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1980-Something-Space-Guy Posted September 26, 2016 11 minutes ago, fred67 said: Ladies and gentlemen; proof positive you could literally slap a brick on a plate and have it accepted by ideas: https://ideas.lego.com/projects/154740 Â Wow. There is a slight possibility that project might be sarcastic. In all likelihood though it's probably just a kid. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
pittpenguin123 Posted September 26, 2016 15 minutes ago, fred67 said: Ladies and gentlemen; proof positive you could literally slap a brick on a plate and have it accepted by ideas: https://ideas.lego.com/projects/154740 Â His username checks out Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Robert8 Posted September 26, 2016 1 hour ago, fred67 said: Ladies and gentlemen; proof positive you could literally slap a brick on a plate and have it accepted by ideas: https://ideas.lego.com/projects/154740  Someone posted a 2x4 red brick and it was accepted lol I think it was @LegoPercyJ but I'm not sure Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1980-Something-Space-Guy Posted September 26, 2016 1 hour ago, pittpenguin123 said: His username checks out Well, since "only the best is good enough", I'm guessing "Good" won't be enough for Lego. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
x105Black Posted September 27, 2016 (edited) Wow, yeah, that's awful. Edited September 27, 2016 by x105Black Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1980-Something-Space-Guy Posted September 27, 2016 I remember some years ago I saw someone who made their own minifigure series as an idea. Of course that was never gonna work... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
